• toofpic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    721 year ago

    We’re maintaining and developing OpenVMS OS, and both we and our customers need Cobol, Fortran, and other half-dead languages coders.
    Many large companies maintain their old systems and use them for production or data processing purposes. Sometimes it’s too expensive to migrate off, but im many cases “it just works”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      both we and our customers need Cobol, Fortran, and other half-dead languages coders

      Visual Basic? (fingers crossed)

      • toofpic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Oh, I’m sorry man. I don’t know everything, I’m working there less than a year, but I only heard of VB a couple of times. In order of popularity it’s like: C, C++, Java, then everything else

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I was just kidding - I haven’t touched Visual Basic in almost 20 years now. I’m not sure I could still code in it even if I wanted to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        It can be viewed as a success. A bridge or building that only lasts five years wouldn’t be considered successful, especially if it took monumental effort to make it in the first place. For some reason, we don’t value that in software.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          I wrote a Classic ASP app in 1999 that placed a web UI atop a mainframe application that dated to the late '70s and allowed easy navigation of really enormous data structures. I learned last year that it’s still in use at that company; amazing not just because my code is still around but because that fucking mainframe code is still running.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      I’ve seen those postings and some executive is living in dreamland thinking they can hire someone to do that for $25/hr.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        341 year ago

        My bosses tried to ask me if I knew anyone the could hire for a full time position at a hospital. I ask for more details and eventually they relent because they aren’t having any luck on indeed/craigslist/temp recruiter.

        It’s a 24 hour on call position for ‘up to’ $55,000 to be the sole IT staff for a 100 bed hospital in upstate NY.

        I literally laughed at them, but they seem to insist they are gonna find someone to take the job.

        I actually think the job isn’t even legal as described.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          221 year ago

          Hahahaha, what a joke.

          Sorry, not interested in 24hr on call until they start talking $100k+. That’s asking a lot of someone.

          Sounds like they need multiple staff, actually. You can’t do on-call without having a rotation. What happens if Bob gets hit by a bus? This tells me all I need to know about them. Typical SMB “leadership”, they lack any concept of managing systems - be it IT, finance, mechanical, whatever. All systems have their management models.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          With those requirements I would expect $500k with 6 weeks paid leave. What a bunch of clowns.

      • toofpic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I know for sure several airports are using OpenVMS, and there are more we don’t know about, as some companies keep running yheir stuff for decades not asking anyone for support.
        And I’m sure There are multiple other old systems out there, it’s too hard to replace them.
        And they work! Our VMS stuff runs great, it’s fast, and the uptime is measured in decades sometimes. So the problem is hardware: we rolled out the first production x86 version this year, so our users are fine (it’s still an issue of porting your software, but it’s not as terrible as building everything from scratch), but before that OpenVMS could run on Itanium servers at latest, and the platform was dying off since the beginning of 2000s, so it is a problem to find a normal replacement machine now.

          • @[email protected]B
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

            it is.

            Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

            I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ve worked in that area. It was broken back in the 90s and I doubt the crusty old parts of the system have gotten any better. I was tasked with writing a more modern wrapper for part of the legacy system, and when I asked for documentation I was told they had literally nothing to give me.

          I was just an intern at the time so maybe someone with more clout could have gotten sometime to dig in a forgotten closet for old technical docs, but it still strikes me as a very bad sign when technical docs for a system every agent uses all day every day aren’t immediately available on the company’s intranet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      And in many cases if it gets replaced it’s for a system that looks fancier but actually has more problems than the original… See Phoenix for the Canadian government employees pay.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      491 year ago

      I’m a COBOL developer. For old COBOL systems it’s not just a case of it being expensive to “migrate away”, it’s extremely risky and for no significant benefit.

      Businesses have essentially two options, modernize what they already have, or tear everything apart and start from scratch. COBOL programs don’t “just work”, they’re good at what they need to do (business transactions). Therefore, there isn’t a significant need to rewrite everything, especially when it’s possible to modernize and reuse existing business logic contained within COBOL programs. For example, COBOL programs aren’t tied to old hardware, you can run your COBOL applications on the cloud instead. This is much safer and cheaper than rewriting everything.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I work primarily in a Long Tail language (languages don’t die, but they have a long tail where usage slowly creeps away). I tell the business that we could ultimately solve all the problems with the platform except for one: finding new programmers to hire for it. That’s what will ultimately force us to migrate. Doesn’t have anything to do with cost or ability to take on new features or handle new ways of doing things.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          When it comes to COBOL developers, there are a lot of developers retiring but there are also a lot of programmers being trained in COBOL every year. It’s for this reason that the average age of COBOL developers has stayed roughly the same for the past 2 decades despite retirements.

          But that said the total number of COBOL developers is decreasing overall, which is an issue.

          Not many young programmers want to learn COBOL. COBOL isn’t taught in many educational institutions. There are very few online resources that programmers can use to self-teach COBOL.

          It’s a shame. COBOL is great for it’s specific use case but it isn’t very “accessible” in that regard when compared to other languages.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            I feel this way about mainframes sometimes too, I had a class in mainframes but we weren’t really taught about job options or where they still fit in the industry.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you actually do have decades of fortran experience, work for NOAA. Their weather models are mostly fortran and they need engineers. Specifically the NOAA EPIC contract that i worked on previously definitely needs people knowledgeable in fortran and was 100% work from home. Feel free to DM me if you want more details.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are probably many people in Japan with this skillset given that they’re only now getting off disks for certain government processes.

        • tiredofsametab
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Not particularly, based on my experience. Now, if you want AS/400 people and such…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          There’s lots of people all over the world in their 30s and 40s and older with this experience.

  • LiveLM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ooh, someone is about to make BANK!

      • Alex
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Celebrating Ceaușescu’s death? /j

    • Kit Sorens
      link
      fedilink
      English
      621 year ago

      Some retired old fart who can’t be bothered to learn fancy-schmancy Web 2.0. Rock on like it’s '93

    • Fat Tony
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why would someone make a lot of money from this?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Supply and demand. The people that have a lot of experience with those systems are retired or should be retiring soon.

        Supply is pretty low. So they can demand higher pay.

        DB’s demand is pretty strong. If those systems go down, trains don’t run, and that costs them millions.

        It’s cheaper to pay someone a lot of money vs having their systems fail.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This, I had multiple old machines with these kinds of specs, I put Slackware on them, dropped in an ethernet card (or two), and used them for all sorts of things, iptables firewall/router, email server, network storage, irc server, etc. It breathed new life into seriously outdated hardware.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Those german railways shouldn’t be running proprietary winblows garbageware to begin with. Shouldn’t they be running Suse?

    • ☂️-
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i like linux but this sounds as nightmarish as rewriting everything, because thats probably what you’d need to do to make it work.

      and by that point you can upgrade the hardware.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      why would you think it would run better if you don’t even know if is it possible to install it in the first place? 🤔

  • PMFL
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    If it works, don’t change it!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        The secret is to develop your software, then fire all the developers. Then it never changes again!

        Come to think of it keeping developers on staff, and familiar with the codebase enough to debug it efficiently, almost guarantees they’re gonna be adding new features. “Well we’ve got this talent sitting around …” and then it’s new features and ….

        I mean I guess this is evidence they’ve managed to isolate themselves from dependencies they don’t control. It’s the external dependencies updating and losing support that causes at least the minimum of codebase maintenance.

        The fact they’ve stayed on this older platform indicates they’ve managed to avoid that constant upgrading. Because if any part of the system has to upgrade, it tends to pull the rest of the system with it.

        This gem requires this version of ruby requires this operating system etc.

        Or maybe they’ve isolated the parts really well and this is just some window3.11 container that’s one of a hundred services.

        I’d love to go back to tech without the constant insomnia and panic attacks.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    It’s the only way to keep the trains free from cylon interference.

    Battletrain Deutchlandica

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Eventually AI’s gonna be so cheap, someone reading this thread could just be like “eh fuck let’s see if the first episode is good” and then just paste that comment into a website somewhere, wait ten seconds, and click the big play button next to “Season 1, Episode 1”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    781 year ago

    Imagine both the annoyance and job security having to manage MS-DOS and 3.1 systems for a railroad would entail.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Frankly that’s nothing. In the worst case a train won’t start, which for DB really isn’t something unusual. It’s far more disturbing how the whole global financial market sometimes rely on code that’s still written in COBOL.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        rely on code that’s still written in COBOL.

        Does this really matter? It’s more of a maintenance issue than a functional one.

        It all gets compiled down to binary, anyways.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Well it matters when it comes to replacing ageing programmers with very few options available. It’s definitely not something taught in schools today, so one has to be very deliberately learn it.

          Don’t get me wrong, you can make a lot of money in such a position. But you also have to deal with COBOL.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          it matters because it is a language that few people learn, so the available talent is scarce, increasing the chance something bad happens. Keeping up with an evolving society is essential for the longevity of a service

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            the available talent is scarce

            I have a friend who is going to take over maintenance for a smaller regional banking system in a few years. It’s mostly COBOL and the systems themselves have not been updated in like 25-30 years. He has been apprenticing under his mother who has been in charge of maintaining the infrastructure there since the late '80s.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      331 year ago

      I would love it so much. I’d feel right at home. I miss sitting in my room and learning everything I could about DOS. That was the best time I ever had with computers.

      I once built, setup, and maintained about 20 computers for a Christian school for free just because I loved doing it so much.

      I wish I still had that enthusiasm for tech.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Me too.

        In high school, there was a kid who was always trying to make money. Like even then, he wanted his own business. In fact he had a couple small ones back then.

        One of his endeavours was massive LAN parties. He had the capital to rent spaces, hardware, and was even able to get sponsorships.

        He did not have the tech chops to do it though.

        Myself, and one circle of friends were THE computer nerds of the school, but it wasn’t really seen as a negative for us - then again we did orchestrate a “free day” and got away with it by taking down the schools network from inside and one person had a loud fucking mouth, but we covered our tracks.

        Anyways, we got in free to these LAN parties as long as we set up and maintained shit. Surprisingly very few problems, about once a LAN party we had to fix something. And it was useful experience.

        That shit was fucking amazing. I loved it.

        I got home from work. Wife works from home. She has had an ongoing tech issue I can’t really touch because it’s that companies property. But I just don’t want to hear it. At all. I’m dead inside in that regard.

        It’s gotten so bad that I had an issue with my gaming rig.

        I needed to reseat the RAM. Not hard, except the case is mounted on the wall as a display piece that would require moving a bunch of shit before getting a ladder and yada yada.

        I just didn’t game for three days. Just could not muster the energy to care about that. I hate it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          God, I feel that so much. Even with my Steam deck, if it requires too much tweaking I’ll ask my kid. If she’ll do it, great. If not, I’ll find something else to do.

          People burned me out so bad. Everything they did was somehow my fault. Every relative I had called me constantly about silly problems. “My whole quickbooks is deleted. I had it on my desktop and now it’s gone!” “Ok, so I copied excel from my desktop onto usb drive and it won’t open on my other computer. The icon is there but it just won’t work. Oh, well I don’t see why not! It works fine when I click it on the other one!”

          One time a guy brought me his laptop to repair. I repaired it and got the $75 bucks I charged. More than a year later I got a call, “Lithen, I don’t know what you did to my laptop, but it hathen’t worked, like, for crap, thinthe you worked on it.” I said, “ok bud, I’ve worked on hundreds. Which one was yours?” I asked him to download TeamViewer, went to his control panel, seen a pile of bullshit crapware he had recently installed, told him to kiss my ass and take it to “thomeone elthe”. I shouldn’t have made fun of his lisp, but I was ready to implode from the crap at that point.

          People call me now and I play dumb and act like I just haven’t kept up with the changes. I. Hate. Computers.

          And I fucking hate that, because I loved them so much when I was younger. It was like exploring a whole new universe.

    • MeanEYE
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Well, DOS is open source now. And that old hardware was quite reliable. Fewer moving parts, I’d expect fewer things to break.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Only MS-DOS 1.25 and 2.0 are open-sourced under MIT license, anything newer is not. These versions were pretty bare-bones, only DOS 2.0 implemented directories for example.

        Unless you mean FreeDOS, which is an open-source DOS-based operating system, which generally should work with any DOS programs/games, but it still may not be 100% compatible with some proprietary software.

        • MeanEYE
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Yes, meant FreeDOS, and older versions of DOS. Can’t say I had issues with FreeDOS. But then again, it’s not like I use it daily.

    • sab
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      Oh, everyone who ever travels by train in Europe will tell you that the German infrastructure is very much broken. You’re lucky if your delay is less than a day travelling through Germany.

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Germany doesn’t really seem like a very efficient country, they still use fax for things and every person has to manage like 10,000 different insurances for everything. Seems like an old (and inaccurate) ww2 trope.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s mostly a misunderstanding of what is valued in German society. The common trope is that German society covets precision. This is not the case. German society covets unwavering precision in the adherence to norms. To the point where innovation is akin to revolution in the negative sense, and pigheadedness in procedure is considered a workplace virtue. In the mean time nothing gets done. Source: expat in Germany.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Migrant implies the non permanent kind because a permanent migrant is referred to as an “immigrant”.

                  What’s the technical difference between a migrant and an expat?

              • Skelectus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I believe the difference is that an expat moved there non-permanently, while an immigrant moved there permanently

                Though if I ever somehow became an expat, I wouldn’t use the word because of how people associate it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Immigrant = Someone who has moved to another country permanently. Migrant = Someone who has moved to another country temporarily.

                  Expat is often used by western migrants who don’t like the word “migrant”.

                  I take issue with it because people classify an Indian doctor moved to the US as a migrant but an American doctor eho has moved to Europe is an expat.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  No it’s just about moneymaking and education level. If you’re a foreigner and highly educated and get a good paying job like IT consultant or doctor, you’re an expat. If you’re low educated and get a low paying job like construction or factory or no job, you’re a migrant. One is liked more than the other, hence the difference they make. The first doesn’t speak local language, but does speak English, and few people care. The second doesn’t speak local language and no English and is disliked for it.How long you stay is not very relevant. AfD doesn’t hare expats as much as other migrants, for example…

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  What you call an expat is a temporary immigrant. “Expats” fill immigration forms in their country of migration, not expatriation forms. Politicians pass laws that govern immigration, not expatriation.

                  That word is meant to differentiate rich (and white, often) workers from the poor, because “immigrant” has a negative connotation. That’s why I take issue with it.

                  The truth is, the poor might be temporary migrants too (cf Pakistanis in Dubai). The media still uses the word migrants for those. We don’t know if they’re “expats” or not, we just assume because they’re not rich or white enough.

                  Quick disclaimer here: I’m not saying you are racist for using the word. I just wanted to explain why I react so strongly when I hear it.

              • loobkoob
                link
                fedilink
                141 year ago

                Yes, as long as they’re also white and middle/upper class!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Also bureaucracy is through the roof in everything, i have no idea who the fuck thinks of germany as efficient.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            As an outside observation, Germans seem to make things better than they need to be in a detrimental way. For example, we redid one of our bathroom showers using the Schluter Kerdi waterpoofing system. They have very specific instructions on how to space the screws, how to seal the screws, how to seal the edges, how to mix the thinset, and probably some other things I can’t remember off the top of my head. They put it through a battery of tests, including going under 100’ of water. Who needs that? Don’t worry about it.

            This stuff replaces cement board, which isn’t strictly waterproof, at least not on its own. It’s also significantly more expensive.

            I do think it’s worthwhile for a home DIYer to get. The instructions are clear and it’s less likely you’ll screw something up that could result in disaster. That said, this thing is just waiting for a Japanese company to come along and make something 90% as good for 50% of the price. That’s basically what happened in the German vs Japanese car market, and there’s already some products on this market like that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              An old mechanic friend of mine used to say “German cars are over-engineered and under-designed”, lol.

              Having worked on every brand of car out there, his description, and your explanation make a lot of sense together.

              I’ve never seen such a clear and concise comparison of German/Japanese manufacturing, you really nailed it.

              Both approaches have their place, the key is to know when to apply them.

          • sab
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I have no doubt their bureaucrats perform world-class efficiency in their handing out, filling in, faxing and archiving a sophisticated system of paper forms.

            I guess it’s the trap of getting complacent and stopping modernizing as soon as you’ve convinced yourself you have the best system in the world.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              It’s more that the bureaucracy is so complex and fragmented that it’s incredibly hard to digitalize. Lots of small fiefdoms that are entitled to make IT purchasing decisions themselves means paper is the only universal interchange format. In addition there is an unwillingness to change how things have always been done, or to simplify procedures. So there you have it: The German bureaucracy is too fat to move.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                I work for german government agencies from time to time and they are working on it… It’s just really slow because there is so much of it, and due to organizational overhead. Also, there is not a single push for the entirety of Germany, but some things everyone does for themselves.

      • Hyperreality
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        German re-unification cost trillions. It’s entirely unsurprising.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Well I live in germany and therefore use the train network on short and long distance frequently and while it is unreliable, “a day” of delay is something I have never experienced.
        Most of the delayed trains are late by less than one hour (still atrocious, but not a day’s worth by any means).
        I actually experienced only once a situation where we were given the choice of a hotel or a continuation of our travels by taxi (which we chose) because the train we were in was late one hour or something and the other (last for the day) train could not wait.

        • sab
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well, it’s based on experiences travelling through Germany proper - for example Denmark to France or Italy, including transfers. Often the delay will just be a couple of hours, but then you miss your transfer and you’re screwed.

          Also if you’re on your way to Switzerland the Swiss have no patience for disruptions in their services, so if a train is delayed coming from Germany they’re likely to just not accept it into the country at all.

          I have also heard from people who were told to spend the night in the train, which DB just parked in the outskirts of the city for the night. That way they could offer passengers a place to sleep in the cheapest possible ways. Pregnant women or families with young children were asked to check in to hotels.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s another part of the infrastructure, though: We just don’t have enough rail as well as backup rolling stock.

        And as the federation finally decided to spend some money it’s going to get worse in the next decade or so due to outages due to new constructions being linked up to the old stuff.

        As to the age of the infrastructure – I mean it’s the railway. If a rarely-used branch line still uses mechanical interlocks and there’s no need to upgrade the capacity then the line is going to continue using infrastructure build in the times of the Kaiser. It’s not like those systems are unsafe, it just might be the case that unlike in the days of ole those posts with a gazillion levers aren’t manned all the time so you’ll see an operator drive to it with a car while the train is on its way. Which really isn’t that much of a deal when the branch line goes to a, what, quarry maybe sending out a train every two months or so. Certainly better than to demolish the line and use trucks instead.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      Too critical to be upgraded is something I wish I’d never hear or see again in my professional career.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      These probably operate completely shut from other networks/internet, so I definitely agree. But I guess a lot of folks here are Linux maniacs and can’t stand something running ancient and obsolete OS while the all-mighty Unix-based operating system could solve all of the problems, not mentioning that it would create more in the process.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Until it becomes obsolete, unsupportable, the crux of your operation, and/or the basis for all of your decisions 😬

      (Yes, I read the article, it’s just the signs, but yes, the above still applies!)

      • PhobosAnomaly
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        COBOL has entered the chat

        e: good for legacy employment though. A relative of mine is a Z80 programmer by trade, and he can effectively walk into a job because the talent pool is so small now. Granted - the wages are never great but never poor, and the role is maintenance and troubleshooting rather than being on the leading edge of development - but it’s a job for life.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                It wasn’t for me, too wordy and felt more like something for accounting/corporate than a programmer. I was offered a good-paying job programming COBOL out of college but turned it down because I didn’t want to spend my life with it. But that’s just me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              If it works, why would we want to go through the trouble of switching to another language that will also eventually be regarded as needing to be retired? There’s decades of debugging and improvement done on their system, start over with a new system and all that work needs to be done again but with a programming language that’s probably much more complex and that leaves the door open to more mistakes…

          • Yewb
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            You have to unlearn everything you know to learn it, go look its bad.

          • TheMongoose
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            I’m in two minds about that. One the one hand, yes, of course - as all the original COBOL folks die off, the skills will be even rarer and thus worth more.

            On the other hand, if we keep propping up old shit, the businesses will keep relying on it and it’ll be even more painful when they do eventually get forced to migrate off it.

            On the other other hand, we know it works, and we don’t want to migrate everything into a series of Electron apps just because that’s popular at the moment.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Part of the problem is the cost of moving off it. Some companies simply can’t pay what that would cost, and that’s before you consider the risk.

              Tough spot to be in.

      • SharkAttak
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Not to mention when you want to change the entire system it becomes a huge operation and problem.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Massive risk to that change too.

          So many people don’t understand how risk informs everything a business does.

          What cost is there to a given system being down for one hour? A day? Any regulations around it?

          Often it’s better to pay a known quantity up front than risk potential outages where you can’t predict all the downstream affects.

      • Turun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I’d consider those various states of not working. So… Don’t fix it if it’s not broken!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Is it broke if no one is able to fix it?

      The reason for it to run on such an ancient device is because nobody wants to touch the scripts running on these devices.

      • Hyperreality
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        A lot of these systems are also always on.

        Used to work at an airport that had a similar issue, turning some of these systems off simply isn’t possible. So you end up having to run the replacement system simultaneously with the old system for a few days. Can’t simply take it off line for a day.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Running two systems simultaneously for a couple of days, that’s a huge problem, not solvable

          • Hyperreality
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s an expensive problem, especially if it’s a system that’s being used all across the airport by regular staff.

            You need to train thousands of employees to use the new software, you need to have one person using the old software as a backup, while the other uses the new software, often while surrounded by hundreds of often angry customers.

            And if something goes wrong, which it invaribly does (even if it’s user error or someone snagging a cable), shit can get very expensive. Small delays, add up to larger delays, and cascade through the entire system. Delayed flights, tens of thousands of euros in costs, hotels for thousands of passengers, missed flights, missed meetings, damages, lawsuits, penalties for missed landing/take-off slots, missed time windows for certain cities which don’t allow flights after a certain time, etc. And often you discover legacy stuff while you’re upgrading that needs fixing, stuff that no one knows how to replace anymore or is physically hard to access.

            Sometimes it is genuinely better to leave it. COBOL is 60 years old. There’s still plenty of stuff running on it, exactly because it’s often too expensive and too risky to replace.