• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Yup. They permabanned me for saying I didn’t care when Trump said Liz Cheney should be shot, since she’s called for bombing millions of people.

    So it’s not just calling for violence that’s bannable. Now apathy for violence against the rich is a bannable offense. Smells like panic to me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      I was perma banned for highlighting Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher should be denied the chance to move to Europe to escape Trump. Given they have deep links to PDiddy. A nothing comment, jumped on by emotionally unstable mods. It’s the same on most of the subreddits. If you don’t agree with their perspective, you lose.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    97 months ago

    The elite are scared and exerting power to try to keep it from the public. Why? Because it is short, easy to read, and easy to understand.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    197 months ago

    Wow, reddit has fallen even further than I thought, and I thought it had fallen pretty fucking far.

    • MacN'Cheezus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      Aaron Swartz rotating in his grave so fast rn he’s become a source of renewable energy

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      867 months ago

      I mean, it didn’t start as one, but it morphed into one over time. Early Reddit was pretty great.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        197 months ago

        Yeah I wasn’t aware of the ol platform enshitification pattern. Hardly anyone was - probably the creators and administors of reddit weren’t entirely aware either.

        We were just a bunch of folks on the net trying things.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          29
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          platform enshittification

          It was called Eternal September back from Usenet days when the Internet was mainly an academic thing and every September old users braced for an influx of freshmen starting new academic year and getting access to newsgroups. I was aware shit was reddit’s final form even back in 2006. I’m actually surprised the shareholders left it unmolested for so long.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            287 months ago

            When the students came in and got on Usenet, that was just regular September. Eternal September when AOL or CompuServe, or one of those added Usenet. It was like the kids never had to leave at the end of the academic year.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            127 months ago

            That wasn’t enshittification, just an influx of inexperienced users. Once the corporations got involved, that’s when enshittification truly began.

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      fedilink
      97 months ago

      It wasn’t always like that. The real shitshow only started when Huffman took over.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    267 months ago

    We’re brainwashed to believe in “free speech” so we don’t notice that it doesn’t exist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      137 months ago

      I mean, free speech is a government thing. It’s got nothing to do with private companies. Anyone telling you otherwise is blowing smoke up your ass.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    567 months ago

    huh

    who would have thought that the front page of the internet could also be one of its many giant prolapsed flapping assholes ?

    not just regrading to this specific issue though

  • .Donuts
    link
    fedilink
    3617 months ago

    “we have no choice but to follow Reddits guidelines”

    There’s another choice, but that would require you to look past reddit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      207 months ago

      Not that the mods are aware, but if Reddit disappeared tomorrow, I (sadly) suspect most users would go to Twitter or various Discords.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I’ve thought about it as some of my niche interests have dried up on Reddit and apparently only live on Twitter now.

          And maybe Discord. It’s hard to tell because it’s closed, but I see hints of discussion spilling out into GH issues or whatever.

          I despise both for different reasons, but where else am OlI gonna go if I actually want to talk with the community?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      You plant shit seeds, you get shit weeds. I hate the fact that Reddit has grown since I bailed over for API changes. It hurts my soul knowing I did the right thing and bailed but the vast majority of people who were pissed off at Reddit ended up back on the platform.

          • Blaze (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You can for past crimes, not future crimes.

            The whole statement: https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyworld

            About the manifesto

            If it’s confirmed, I don’t see why not. Depends on the community, of course. I’m sure !lemmybewholesome would remove it.

            https://lemmy.world/comment/13922763

            On the other hand, there is [email protected] that got created recently. This thread can interest you, it talks about jury nullification: https://lemmy.world/post/22973877

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                16
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                To determine whether or not an accused individual is guilty there are two primary options in the USA. A trial before a judge who makes the decision, or a trial by a “jury of your peers” where the whole jury must agree that the individual is guilty. A jury of one’s peers means that the people selected to hear the case are selected from the general populace and have no substantial connection to the accused. For example, you wouldn’t put the person’s mother on the jury. The jurors are not required to be lawyers or experts in any field. Just average people.

                If you just wanted some people to take the facts of the case and the facts of the law and determine whether or not the accused was guilty, then you would want experts and lawyers on the jury. That’s how trials used to be hundreds of years ago. A judge, often appointed by a king, would pass sentence over the peons brought before him. Since our legal system has average everyday people as jurors, clearly they are supposed to do more than that.

                This is where jury nullification comes in. The jurors not only judge based on the facts of the case, but also on whether or not the law in question is just. If an individual is accused of a crime, and is clearly in violation of the law, the juror can still find them not guilty if the law in question is unjust. In essence, the jurors nullify the law by refusing to convict. For example, during the prohibition era, it was not unheard of for juries to return not guilty verdicts for people accused of selling or transporting alcohol. The jurors thought the laws was were wrong so they refused to convict. A much more tragic example was in the deep south where jurors would sometime refuse to convict people of lynching black people.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            !lemmyworld

            We have previously asked moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification when this was suggested in context of murder or other violent crimes. Following a discussion in our team we want to clarify that we are no longer requesting moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification in the context of violent crimes when the crime in question already happened. We will still consider suggestions of jury nullification for crimes that have not (yet) happened as advocation for violence, which is violating our terms of service.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          157 months ago

          Not true - we’re just not allowed to discuss jury nullification in the context of encouraging someone to commit a violent felony which includes the promise of absolution through jury nullification.

          Or something, idk. It was kinda weird.

          Jury nullification as two English words that can be spoken one after the other, however, is perfectly allowable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      They even have to leave, they just have to ignore the admins and become ungovernable.

      But they won’t, because they’re cowards.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      They let us run for 1 week. I think they did not want to have street protests so they let people shit post online.

      Now that they got all of their ducks in order, they are going to suppress the discussions while trying to insert politics to divide us.

      This is the regime play EST

  • Blaze (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    497 months ago

    And before everyone starts dunking on LW, a mod has said that the manifesto would be allowed

    If it’s confirmed, I don’t see why not. Depends on the community, of course. I’m sure !lemmybewholesome would remove it.

    https://lemmy.world/comment/13922763

      • Blaze (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        457 months ago

        I’m definitely not the biggest fan of the current overcentralization of users and communities on LW, but it’s still important to show what their stance is.

    • goferking (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      I get where you are coming from but 1 mod saying it may be okay for them isn’t that reassuring

  • defunct_punk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    457 months ago

    So can I post something that’s NOT Mangione’s manifesto and just change a word or two?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1237 months ago

      “To Nintendo, I’ll keep this short, because I do respect the legacy of what you’ve built. To save you a lengthy investigation, I state plainly that I wasn’t working with anyone. This was fairly trivial: some elementary research, basic plumbing know-how, and a lot of patience. The notebook, if recovered, has some scattered notes and plans that outline the gist of it. My toolkit is pretty locked down because I’ve spent years perfecting my craft in fixing leaks and navigating pipes, so there’s likely not much info there. I do apologize for any disruption or shock caused by my actions, but it had to be done. Frankly, these corporate overlords simply had it coming.

      A reminder: Nintendo has long been a giant in the gaming industry, but for decades, the reality is that they’ve leveraged their power against not only creators but their own loyal fans. The restrictive policies, the aggressive legal tactics, the artificial scarcity—all these tactics are designed to extract immense profits while stifling innovation and community-driven creativity. It has grown and grown, but as the freedom for creators? No, the reality is, this company has simply gotten too powerful, and they continue to exploit their position because fans and consumers have allowed them to get away with it.

      Obviously, the problem is more complex, but I do not have space, and frankly, I do not pretend to be the most qualified person to lay out the full argument. But many have highlighted Nintendo’s tactics—shutting down fan projects, ceasing the production of beloved games without explanation—decades ago, and yet the problems persist. This is no longer an issue of awareness; it is a question of unchecked power. Evidently, I am the first to challenge it with such brutal honesty.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        137 months ago

        … Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming. A reminder: the US has the most expensive air travel system in the world, yet we rank poorly in customer satisfaction and on-time performance. United is one of the largest airlines in the US, behind only American and Delta in fleet size. It has grown and grown, …