- UK-made, invisible radio wave weapon knocks out drone swarms for the first time.
- Weapon has potential to help protect against drone threats as nature of warfare changes.
You must log in or register to comment.
They’ll just use EMP tech to harden drones against this
deleted by creator
Which will raise weight, costs, and reduce functionality. It’s like a U lock for a bicycle it’s not impenetrable it just raises the bar
Now we need to figure out a handheld consumer version.
Well, you might be able to do it. But you might not want to be holding it in YOUR hand when you turn it on. :P
Or in the near presence of the FCC or similar agency
The UK made an invisible weapon?
They won the Battle of Britain with invisible military tech they invented, so it’s not that surprising.
That be radar or the bombe’s?
Much better than those visible radio waves.
Also known as “light”, as used in Lasers, which also works to knock down drones.
Radio waves are a specific wavelength/band of the EM spectrum. Light is not radio waves, just as radiowaves aren’t light. Microwaves are another specific wavelength.
They’re both electromagnetic waves.
Look around the space you’re in and notice that you can’t “see” the light, only the things.
What
It’s true! When it’s dark out it isn’t because there’s no light, but because you’re trapped in the void!
You can’t see light. You can see things illuminated by light.
You swap seeing with recognizing. You recognize things. And you see light.
That’s not what the word “see” means. You’re trying to to swap it for another word like “sense.” You see objects, not light.
Bro, take the L and walk away. Seeing is a sense, senses are neurons activated by something, whether it’s; temperature, chemicals, or photons.
You see the light waves reflected off of various materials.
That’s it. And, indeed, you see light. That’s what your eyes do.
Little smart ass knowhow: With your hands, you can feel light.
You feel infrared light as heat. Not visible light though. Just heat up your cooker stove and it emits a bit visible red and a lot infrared light. Don’t touch just keep your hand close to the stove. Now you feel the IR-„light“.
Or just take an IR-lamp for your neck pain. You‘ll feel the light that’s emitting with your hands.
You don’t see the things, you see the light reflecting off of them
That’s not what the word “see” means.
It is literally activating the rods and cones based on photons hitting them. Do you think we don’t smell smells either?
The word “see” predates any concept of rods or cones or photons by thousands of years. It has nothing to do with those things.
What are you completely making up?
Ah yes, that’s famously why screens literally build tiny versions of the world inside them. We don’t see the light, we see the objects!
The light that enters your eye carries enormous amounts of information with it. Your eye and a small portion of your brain comprise a highly specific tool for extracting a small subset of that information and processing it. The information you use is only related to the last object the light interacted with, not the light itself (with the small exception being the “brightness” - that has nothing to do with the object).
No one claims to hear the air in their ears rather than the violin that is being played nearby. That’s just not what the word “hear” means.
The information you use is only related to the last object the light interacted with, not the light itself (with the small exception being the “brightness” - that has nothing to do with the object).
This is obviously false, otherwise all objects would look the same under any color of light - yet they don’t. This example actually shows that it is only the light itself that matters, because it has the information of the objects it interacted with during its lifetime!
No one claims to hear the air in their ears rather than the violin that is being played nearby. That’s just not what the word “hear” means.
But everyone would agree that we’re hearing the sound waves produced by the violin. Again, a great example counter to your point, as the equivalent to a sound wave is the photon.
Don’t look into the laser with remaining eye.
Imagine if they showed real physics in sci-fi movies. You’d never see any laser blasts in space, just the result of their strike.
You sure can see plasma cannons though…
And green lasers
And any color light saber. Regardless if there’s particles in the surrounding atmosphere or not.
Put your eye in the beam and tell me that again…
Lasers are more useful in surveillance and navigation and guidance and precision work in production, for a weapon they are, most of the time, out of place. Expensive, unreliable and weak.
You overestimate the education of the average person
Invisible weapons are all the rage these days.
Have I got a box of invisible rocket launchers to sell you.
Damn. We gotta close the missile gap eith the six-year-olds.
Anybody know if it has a phased array antenna? a) those are cool b) they can aim much faster than an antenna that needs to physically pivot
Judging by the picture I’m sure it is
So when can we start shipping them to Ukraine? Even from a selfish perspective its a perfect environment to field test this.
The project supports more than 135 highly skilled jobs across the UK
Is that 135 individual positions, or just some mumbo jumbo job titles they’re making up?
The UK police can’t determine what is a legal 249gm drone or not as seen many times over with the auditors, so how on earth is this thing gonna work is beyond me?
Just trash the airwaves I guess.
It uses high frequency radio waves to disrupt or damage critical electronic components inside drones, causing them to crash or malfunction.
At a range of 1km…
That‘s useful not just for drones. I wonder if this works against helicopters, too.
It sounds like it’s a directed microwave cooker. Works on people too, just not ones behind good cover.
Edit: ah, high frequency, my bad, it’s a gamma gun. Same principles apply I think, give or take the cover.
Why does that title sound like it’s out of a 1940’s war reel?
Possibly because it’s presented how news used to be - a simple statement of fact without embellishment or click bait.
Would you rather:
You won’t BELIEVE how this weapon built by British boffins can yeet hundreds of Russian drones from the sky in seconds
UK slams dozens of drones with invisible radio waves
UK blasts rays of DEATH to doomed drones
Nice honkers
How is knocking out drone swarms different from knocking out any other communications?
I swear, such news are reminiscent of the notorious tech illiteracy in “Wraith Squadron” books from Star Wars EU. With that Bothan being, ya knaw, able to just check all of one planet’s communications from the orbit after arriving there. The author (not to insult him) didn’t even consider how preposterous it would be on our planet, which doesn’t know hyperspace travel and other SW-grade tech yet, to be able to process that amount of information, no “hacking” parts even being discussed.
Which is even worse when pre-Wraith parts of the series are pretty sane and Corran as a character knows what he’s doing.
Of course protocols used in such applications have DoS vulnerabilities that can be found and used. And a lot of existing equipment can be employed in that too. Just - why does the headline read so stupid.
As per the article:
It uses high frequency radio waves to disrupt or damage critical electronic components inside drones, causing them to crash or malfunction.
Its not jamming the comms, its inducing currents inside the electronics of the drone to fry them.
Ah. OK. That’s nicer. Makes sense in the time of consumer hardware dominating frontlines.
Basically, EMP but directed.
Can we get the waves to produce “Hootie and the Blowfish: I only wanna be with you”? That would be quite epic.
These can only do “Hold My Hand”
I wondered how long it would take for them to figure this out. Or simply take control of the drones.
