Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    Guess we’re doing stupid identity verification orbs now: https://sfstandard.com/2025/05/01/this-is-like-black-mirror-sam-altmans-creepy-eye-scanner-project-launches-in-sf/

    Instead of this expensive imitation of a voigt-kampff test I would suggest an alternative method of detecting if a personoid is really a human or an instrument of an evil inhuman intelligence that wishes to consume all of earth: check if their net worth is closer to a billion dollars than it is to being broke.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Also not that this ‘key was generated by a person once’ stuff does not validate personhood, it just means an identifiable person was involved once. So, it can be used to blame somebody, not prove personhood

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    Another great piece from Brian Merchant. I’ve been job seeking on network engineering and IT support and had naively assumed that companies would consider the stakes of screwing up infrastructure too high to take risks with the bullshit machine, but it definitely looks like the trend he described of hiring less actual humans is at play here, even as the actual IT infrastructure gets bigger and more complex from people integrating this shit.

    • David GerardM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      looks like a billionaire group chat collective delusion, see also return-to-office

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      after I’ve previously posted this and this, an update: both the memrise browser version and the iOS app now have “chat to a buddy” as a non-skipable step in course iteration

      the “buddy” is a chatbot of unclear provenance. this page mentions “MemBot - powered by AI” at the top, which is a link to this zendesk page, but that’s a dead link

      • Sailor Sega Saturn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Along the same lines of LLMs ruining language stuff: I just learned the acronym MTPE (Machine Translation Post Edit) in the context of excuses to pay translators less and thanks I hate it.

        Can’t avoid slop reading translated books, can’t learn the source language without dodging slop in learning tools left and right. It’s the microplastics of the internet age.

        Anyway my duolingo account is no more, I have better resources for learning German anyway.

        • Mii
          link
          fedilink
          English
          142 months ago

          Along the same lines of LLMs ruining language stuff: I just learned the acronym MTPE (Machine Translation Post Edit) in the context of excuses to pay translators less and thanks I hate it.

          Not-so-fun fact: that’s a marketing term for what amounts to basically a scam to pay people less.

          I used to work for a large translation company when this first came up. Admittedly, that was almost ten years ago, but I assume this shit is even more common nowadays. The usual procedure was to have one translator translate the stuff (commonly using what’s called a TM or Translation Memory, basically a user dictionary so the wording stays consistent), and then another translator to do an editing pass to catch errors. For very high-impact translations, there could be more editing passes after that.

          MTPE is now basically omitting the first translator and feeding it through a customized version of what amounts to Google Translate or DeepL that can access the customer’s TM data, and then handing it off to a translator for the editing pass. The catch now is that freelance translators have two rates: one for translating, depending on the language pair between $0.09 and $0.5 per word, and one for editing, which is significantly less. $0.01 to $0.12 or so per word, from what I remember. The translation rate applies for complete translations, i.e. when a word is not in the customer’s TM. If it is in the TM, the editing rate applies (or, if the translator has negotiated a clever rate for themselves, there might be a third rate). With MTPE, you now essentially feed the machine heaps of content to bloat up the TM as much as possible, then flag everything as pre-translated and only for editing, and boom, you can force the cheapest rates to apply to what is essentially more work because the quality of what comes out of these machines is complete horseshit compared to a human-translated piece.

          For the customers, however, MTPE wasn’t even that much cheaper. The biggest difference was in the profit margin for the translation company, to no one’s surprise.

          Back when I worked there, and those were the early days, a lot of freelance translators flat-out refused to do MTPE because of this. They said, if the customer wants this, they can find another translator, and because a lot of customers wanted to keep the translators they’d had for a long time, there was some leverage there.

          I have no idea how the situation is today, but infinitely worse I assume.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      My kids use Duolingo for extra training of languages they are learning in school, so this crapification hits close to home.

      Any tips on current non-crap resources? Since they learn the rules and structure in school it’s the repetition of usage in a fun way that I am aiming for.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        I’ve been using Anki, it works great but requires you to supply the discipline and willingness to learn yourself, which might not be possible for kids.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        no idea, sorry. “find some wordpals online” maybe but then you need to also deal with the vetting/safety issue

        it’s just so fucking frustrating

      • raoul
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        I find Duolingo to be of low quality.

        I like Babbel. It’s not free and they have a relatively limited number of languages but I find the quality really good (at least for French -> Deutsch).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 months ago

    Still frustrated over the fact that search engines just don’t work anymore. I sometimes come up with puns involving a malapropism of some phrase and I try and see if anyone’s done anything with that joke, but the engines insist on “correcting” my search into the statistically more likely version of the phrase, even if I put it in quotes.

    Also all the top results for most searches are blatant autoplag slop with no informational value now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      On the (slim) upside, it’s an opportunity to ditch Google, and maybe it will sooner or later break their monopoly position. I switched my main search engine to Ecosia a while ago, I think it uses Bing underneath (meh), but presumably it’s more privacy friendly than Google (or Bing directly). I’ve had numerous such attempts over the years already to get away from Google, but always returned, because the search results were just so much better (especially for non-English stuff). But now Google has gotten so much worse that it created almost an equilibrium… sometimes it’s still useful and better, but not that often anymore. So I rarely go to Google now, not because the others got better, but because Google got so much worse.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        Ecosa? The australian mattress in a box company?? (jk)

        Apparently they offer an AI chatbot alongside their services, so…

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 months ago

          The same goes with DuckDuckGo, because the venn diagram of programmers and AI bros is apparently a circle.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Also all the top results for most searches are blatant autoplag slop with no informational value now.

      I just encountered a thing like this. A subject where no matter what you asked about it this one site was in the top 5 with just incomprehensible posts. Like every sentence on its own made sense, but there was nothing more than that. It read like constant promotional ‘before the actual meat of the article’ stuff but forever. Was really weird.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      Still sad the SMRs will not work out but good you posted it here. Lol at the HN guy going ‘these are strawmen’, buddy you build websites perhaps the guy in the field (with a physics phd) knows a little bit more.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      This feels like a lot of straw man arguments?

      No it doesn’t?

      Did anyone ever claim these things?

      Yes?

      Are these problems to implementing SMR? I don’t think so.

      OK, but aside from lower efficiency, higher price per watt, and not solving any of the problems they’re supposed to solve, are there any problems with SMR? I don’t think so.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 months ago

      “The first time I ever suffered offline consequences for a social media post”- Hey Gang, I think I found the problem!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        I have no idea where he stood on the bullshit bad faith free speech debate from the past decade, but this would be funny if he was an anti cancel culture guy. More things, weird bubble he lives in if the other things didn’t get pushed back, and support for the pro trans (and pro Palestine) movements. He is right on the immigration bit however, the dems should move more left on the subject. Also ‘Blutarsky’ and I worried my references are dated, that is older than I am.

        • David GerardM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 months ago

          he’s a centrist econ blogger who’s been getting into light race science

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 months ago

            I’m a centrist. I think we should aim for the halfway point between basic human decency and hateful cruelty. I’m also willing to move towards the hateful cruelty to appease the right, because I’m a moderate.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 months ago

            And he is brave enough to say that:

            • There is a sensible compromise somewhere between the Biden/Harris immigration bill that would have got rid of due process for suspected illegal immigrants and the Trump policy of just throwing dark people into vans for shipment to slave labour camps.

            • Genocide is just sensible bipartisanship.

            • Trans people are not people.

            Much centrist, much sensible. Much surprise he is getting into race science. It the centre (defined as the middle ground of Attila and Mussolini) moves, the principled centrist must move with it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 months ago

            yeah I tried looking up his writings on the subject but substack was down. Counted that as a win and stopped looking.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 months ago

      “Kicked out of a … group chat” is a peculiar definition of “offline consequences”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The insistence on blipping out anything even vaguely sexual (like the word orgasm) to appease the kami of the algorithm is really off putting after a while.

      I thought he might be doing a bit but it doesn’t feel like it. Also he speaks like old comic word balloons where they would randomly bold every third noun to show intensity.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 months ago

    OT: does anyone else get David and David Gerrold confused all the time?

    Also I’m in Viljandi!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      Said revenue estimates, as of 2026, include billions of dollars of “new products” that include “free user monetization.”

      If you are wondering what that means, I have no idea. The Information does not explain.

      Probably something to do with their recent ramblings about getting an openai social network off the ground.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      throwback uni game!

      Edit:

      From the article: I apologize, this is going to be a little less reserved than usual.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    2 months ago
    From:  The Sentry Team <[email protected]>
    Subject:	Update to Sentry’s List of Subprocessors
    ...
     - Google LLC (Google Cloud Services) and OpenAI, L.L.C. are now reflected as subprocessors for all Sentry products, instead of select features only; and
     - Anthropic, PBC is now added as a subprocessor.
    

    sigh

    they do still have user-specified controls (and appear to respect them), but… sigh

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 months ago

      Gonna copy this in because there’s a lot to unpack, and I don’t want to do it alone.

      Text of the Thielmail in that first tweet:
      From: Peter Thiel
      Date: Sunday, January 5, 2020 at 2:44 AM
      To: Mark Zuckerberg, Nick Clegg, Antonio Lucio
      Cc: Sheryl Sandberg, Marc Andreessen
      Subject: RE: Milennials
      
      There are many themes that could be developed
      more here; let me make a few quick points for now:
      
      Nick -- I certainly would not suggest that our policy
      should be to embrace Millennial attitudes
      unreflectively. I would be the last person to
      advocate for socialism. But when 70% of Millennials
      say they are pro-socialist, we need to do better than
      simply dismiss them by saying that they are stupid
      or entitled or brainwashed; we should try and
      understand why. And, from the perspective of a
      broken generational compact, there seems to be a
      pretty straightforward answer to me, namely, that
      when one has too much student debt or if housing
      is too unaffordable, then one will have negative
      capital for a long time and/or find it very hard to
      start accumulating capital in the form of real estate;
      and if one has no stake in the capitalist system, then
      one may well turn against it.
      
      1. Part of me wishes that the font were just a little bigger. This way, the word wrap would come to 10 syllables a line, and we could pretend this was a lost Shakespeare monologue.
      2. I’m almost disappointed by this. Thiel, suggesting that it might not, in fact, be the children that are wrong? Where’s your ideological purity, Thiel? Didn’t know you started reading r/GenZedong.
      3. Also, it’s Peter fucking Thiel lecturing Nick fucking Clegg, former leader of the lib dems in the UK, on paying lip service to socialist policy in order to stymie any real societal progress???
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        Not gonna lie got a bit jump scared by woke Peter Thiel here. Of course I’m pretty sure his actual solution involves giving young people houses confiscated from those perfidious brown people of one stripe or another. The problem can’t be an inherent injustice in a system that allows for both Peters Thiel and (insert your favorite broke person here) to exist in the same market.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 months ago

      A whole generation is leaning more socialist because homeownership is unattainable and student debt is crushing. The solution is whatever is the latest big tech fad.

      Just like all of gen X’s problems would have been solved with more .com, right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      That Michael Kove guy is one un-self-aware twat. Apparently all millennials work in high paying tech jobs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      “The millenials were so well paid in tech jobs during the boom that they nevered bothered to invest in homes” is … a take

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      The replies are a long sequence of different stupid takes… someone recommending cryptocurrency to build wealth, blaming millennials for not investing in homes, a reply literally blaming too much spending on starbucks, blaming millennials overreacting to the 2008 crisis by not buying homes, blaming millennials being socialists, blaming millennials going to college, blaming millennials for not making the big bucks in tech. About 1 in 10 replies point out the real causes: wages have not grown with costs or with real productivity and capitalism in general favors people holding assets and offering loans over people that have to borrow and rent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      These people probably think Karl Marx is Satan, but my god at least he was able to understand and respect Adam Smith better than whoever’s trying to magick wealth out of this absolute idiot soup! Looks like capitalism the ideology is just as unsustainable as capitalism the economic system.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Huh, I had missed the part in 2020 when Peter Thiel just flat out stated outright that it only makes sense to be in favour of capitalism if you’re a capital owner.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m a Millenial (even if I think these labels are dumb) and I find these kinds of things fascinating. Esp when they describe things I do not recognize in any way in my peers, re them talking about the causes of people disliking capitalism. Sure I’m in a more progressive/leftwing bubble (of which I’m prob the most extreme nowadays in various ways), but I know a lot of people who are looking into buying houses/have bought houses who still are not fans of musk/tesla etc. Seems like they forget people can have principles, and just look at a simplistic view of ‘material conditions’ (I hope people paid attention to the recent bsky shit on what this actually means in historical context). Flashbacks to r/ssc talking about ‘leftwing polticians not thinking about X’ while the leftwing politicans I knew irl were actively talking about it. Feels very like im looking at an alternative world. (Prob also quite true as im Dutch, and this is about the US (with right wing fan fave Poland having a honorable mention)).

      Do think it is amusing Millenials get blamed for everything still. The punching bag generation. Poor Gen Z, for which this is now starting up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        I will never forget a conversation in High School where our resident young conservative sneered about how “sure $Welfare_Program sound nice, but you’ll be paying for it with your taxes” and we all responded with some variant of “I mean, yeah? That’s how that works, isn’t it?”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 months ago

          Image description:

          A tweet from ‘Mike’: “Bernie Sanders should be forced to give away 90% of his birthday cake #HappyBirthdayBernie”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 months ago

        AI data centers brought some ratty bloggers into their five minutes of fame, while a boat only brought Ziz &co from Alaska to SFBA

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      apparently this got past IRB, was supposed to be a part of doctorate level work and now they don’t want to be named or publish that thing. what a shitshow from start to finish, and all for nothing. no way these were actual social scientists, i bet this is highly advanced software engineer syndrome in action

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        This is completely orthogonal to your point, but I expect the public’s gonna have a much lower opinion of software engineers after this bubble bursts, for a few reasons:

        • Right off the bat, they’re gonna have to deal with some severe guilt-by-association. AI has become an inescapable part of the Internet, if not modern life as a whole, and the average experience of dealing with anything AI related has been annoying at best and profoundly negative at worst. Combined with the tech industry going all-in on AI, I can see the entire field of software engineering getting some serious “AI bro” stench all over it.

        • The slop-nami has unleashed a torrent of low-grade garbage on the 'Net, whether it be zero-effort “AI art” or paragraphs of low-quality SEO optimised trash, whilst the gen-AI systems responsible for both have received breathless hype/praise from AI bros and tech journos (e.g. Sam Altman’s Ai-generated “metafiction”). Combined with the continous and ongoing theft of artist’s work that made this possible, and the public is given a strong reason to view software engineers as generally incapable of understanding art, if not outright hostile to art and artists as a whole.

        • Of course, the massive and ongoing theft of other people’s work to make the gen-AI systems behind said slop-nami possible have likely given people reason to view software engineers as entirely okay with stealing other’s work - especially given the aforementioned theft is done with AI bros’ open endorsement, whether implicitly or explicitly.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 months ago

    Aw man, Natasha Lyonne is going AI. Notably she is partnering with a company, Moonvalley, that claims to have developed an “ethical” model, Marey, trained on “clean” data- i.e. data that is owned or licensed by Moonvalley and whoever else they are partnering with.

    • David GerardM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      looking into this, but as far as i can tell the AI here is entirely fake

      need more to declare it such

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        Thanks for looking into it. The idea of an ethical data set large enough to train an LLM is suspicious.

        • David GerardM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          current thesis is A Guy Instead in the Philippines, dressing up wireframes

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            Now I want an anti-AI song parody called “A Guy Instead” to the tune of the Beatle’s “I’ll Cry Instead”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      ah yes the 937 partners of this website and their legitimate interest to scan and own your thoughts forever

      i don’t expect literally this but there’s some potential hidden sleaziness inside

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      I mean I appreciate the attempt to mitigate one of the many problems with genAI, but I would expect the smaller dataset to make a model that confabulates even more and is gonna be even harder to work with than something like Sora. Like, I’m sure a decent director will be able to make something with it but I can’t see how it’s going to be better results or more time/money/labor efficient than human VFX pipelines even if you pay the poor bastards decently.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        That and also: training and running a model still takes a ton of energy! LLMs will never be ethical.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And thus Poker Face joins Sandman in the “no longer interested in Season 2” pile, but for different reasons.

      The plot of Uncanny Valley centers on “a teenage girl who becomes unmoored by a hugely popular AR video game in a parallel present.”

      So, Tron again, then. But with goggles this time.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      Either they’re lying and the number is greatly exaggerated (very possible), or this will eventually destroy the company.

      I’m thinking the latter - Silicon Valley is full of true believers, after all.

      • David GerardM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        Nadella said written “by software” “on some products” so he’s barely making a claim

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Maybe It’s just CEO dick measuring, so chads Nadella and PIchai can both claim a rock hard 20-30% while virgin Zuckeberg is exposed as not even knowing how to put the condom on.

      Microsoft CTO Kevin Scott previously said he expects 95% of all code to be AI-generated by 2030.

      Of course he did.

      The Microsoft CEO said the company was seeing mixed results in AI-generated code across different languages, with more progress in Python and less in C++.

      So the more permissive at compile time the language the better the AI comes out smelling? What a completely unanticipated twist of fate!