Republicans are drunk with power. What a stupid fucking idea. There’s no chance of banning porn. Then they wouldn’t be able to jerk to Trans women and feel shame after.

Trans women are hot, in case that reads as though the shame is correct. It’s not.

  • Rose
    link
    fedilink
    232 months ago

    Conservatives keep saying they’re for the common people.

    Are they? Are they really? Seems to me they’re really busy doing stuff that regular folks hate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1582 months ago

    “Obscenity isn’t protected by the First Amendment, but hazy and unenforceable legal definitions have allowed extreme pornography to saturate American society and reach countless children,” Lee said in a press release. “Our bill updates the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age so this content can be taken down and its peddlers prosecuted.”

    My memory is a bit hazy, but I think this phrasing is taken almost verbatim from Project 2025.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      722 months ago

      They are jumping the gun a little here. Project 2025 has declaring basically anything a transperson does as pornographic first then this. Guess some incompetence in execution shouldn’t be surprising from their crowd.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        332 months ago

        I think the order of operations is almost unimportant if their opposition can only secure minor, temporary victories and nobody is truly stopping them. If anything the broad stroke of this bill could be used as cover while states quietly criminalize homosexuality and transgenderism by fiat.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      332 months ago

      Will no one think of the children? Whenever these people say something, the best strategy is look in the opposite direction they are pointing you. In this instance, they are working to pass child-bride full-legalization. They’re definitely thinking of the children.

      • Rhaedas
        link
        fedilink
        252 months ago

        Don’t forget Florida trying to weaken child labor laws. MAGA. If the mine was good enough for great grandpa, it’s good enough for you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 months ago

      Guns fall into children’s hands all the time, something that literally kills, and they don’t seem to give a shit about that

    • unalivejoy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      When you use AI to write your bills and tell it to implement Project 2025.

    • Rhaedas
      link
      fedilink
      462 months ago

      Obscenity isn’t protected by the First Amendment

      Is this the same Constitution that they’re pissing on with everything else? It most certainly does protect it. Do NOT use the “think of the children” shit when your actions towards children safety has been the complete opposite. Hell, I saw news today of further cuts being pursued for Medicare, as well as past things on cutting school lunches and of course the destruction of the DoE. You do NOT care about children, do not bring them into this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        Actually they’ve been trying to invoke the Comstock Act constantly to force ISPs to block porn sites. This particular rallying cry is something I remember since the late Bush II years.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3482 months ago

    They don’t intend to ban anything. They’re just creating reasons to lock people up.

    They are, to a man, insane authoritarian shitbags. All they care about is control.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2402 months ago

      The plan according to project 2025 is to classify trans people existing as pornographic. Wish I was joking. Been warning people about this for a year now.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        332 months ago

        The original documents for project 2025 were released in 2017 well leaked in 2017. And it was talked about for about the day and disappeared and here we are.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          33
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It really made the rounds again in 2020, even to the point of breaking into the mainstream. Probably a lot more people are aware of it than you might think, it’s just the doing something about it that we’re all sticking on.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              112 months ago

              It’s unfortunately not. Go ask your (general) parents or grandparents what it is and what it means. Ask them if they think it’s happening right now and to what extent.

              I bet their answers will be surprising to a lot of people.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            132 months ago

            In 2020 we didn’t have to do anything about it. It was just another set of online nutcases, no one who could get elected would actually try that.

            2025: hold my beer

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Project 2025 has been happening in Oklahoma since 2017. No one gave a shit when it was the asshole of the country, but shit spreads.

          Y’all get to enjoy the suffering I’ve been enjoying for the past ten years.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            152 months ago

            Oh boy, I can’t wait to find out if Oklahoma is a shining utopia, a guiding beacon of the future for the rest of the country.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1202 months ago

        Anything related to queer identities could fall under obscenity by whatever arbitrary definitions they want to use.

        No more pride or rainbow flags, no support groups for queer youth, no sex education, all of that is obscene.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        552 months ago

        Yup, it’s the typical conservative playbook: If you don’t like something, redefine it as something unpopular. Then target the unpopular thing, so democrats can’t oppose it without inciting “this democrat voted against a bill to protect/stop {sympathetic demographic} from {unpopular thing}” smear campaigns.

        Step 1 was equating trans people with sexual predators. You keep that messaging consistent and constant. Find stories of trans people doing normal things, but spin it as if they’re dangerous. Invent stories if you need to, because debunking them takes a lot more time than inventing them…

        They weren’t jogging in a neighborhood; they were casing the neighborhood. They weren’t using a public restroom; they were looking for people to sexually assault. They weren’t trying on clothes to see if they fit; they were looking to assault women and children in the changing rooms. They weren’t volunteering for the local women’s shelter; They were looking for defenseless victims. They weren’t writing a book for other trans people; They were indoctrinating kids and trying to turn them trans. Et cetera, et cetera…

        Once conservative voters have started to accept that messaging, you move onto step 2:
        “This bill will protect children from sexual predators” means it bans trans people from being able to pee.
        “This bill will protect children from being exposed to dangerous sexual material” means it bans any kind of trans iconography by labeling it as porn.
        “This bill will stop sexual predators from hiding in your neighborhood” means it requires trans people to register in a public database/wear a {pink triangle} badge.
        “This bill will ensure sexual predators are kept away from the rest of the population” means it rounds trans people up into camps.

        And if anybody ever tries to point out what the bill is really doing, put them on blast with the “radical left is trying to let sexual predators steal your kids and assault your women” messaging.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          I disagree that it’s conservative. It’s nazi/ authoritarian/radical. For 50 odd years afer ww2 the cons knew this was a daft tactic. Prior to that (well prior to 1790 ish ) con/feudal/landowners managed their serfs and peasants, they didn’t want infighting. (outfighting, thats a different , maybe lucrative albeit lottery).

          Cons are just common or garden cunts. populists are serious, they can mobilise labour .

          The traditional cons wil ride the wave because they have no choice and no friends. until they realise they’ll be expropriated eventually, which the nazis won’t do until after they have critical mass. Fucking con Niemollers

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 months ago

            In the 50 odd years after WW2, we saw them frame civil rights as communism and use the war on drugs to bomb and destroy black neighborhoods.

            This is conservatism.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 months ago

          Sure would be nice if the not-as-conservatives could use their own tactics to flip the script on them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      172 months ago

      That is the pragmatic and short term outcome, but I would not discount the level of power hard-line Christian nationalists have over the far right. Many of them believe “moral degeneracy” like porn is the most grave problem of western society and would be glad to “correct” it given the chance.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        It is.

        We need more media to take advantage of the SCP Foundation. Movies, games, etc. Give the authors credit. Pay them. Because there’s a whole lot of great stuff there.

        SCP-001 “When Day Breaks” would make an incredible horror movie.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      Please don’t drag the insane down to this level. This is planned and intentional (even if there is factional opposition)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 months ago

    who is this Bill, and what does he have against porn. does Bill not know that his other name is Willy?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      freedom to invade your home without a warrant on suspicion for harboring an undesirable.

      freedom to live in crushing debt and be forced to work like a dog your whole life.

      freedom to buy, freedom to sell.

      edit - guess that’s what you get when you elect Biff… twice

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 months ago

        Yeah, that’s the sadness we’ll live with the rest of our lives.

        No one invaded us and did this to us. We did it to ourselves. Because we’re an exceptionally stupid society.

  • bitwolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 months ago

    I’ve been responding to a lot of Republican news with this same comment:

    “What happened to bringing the choice to the states?”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 months ago
      1. Comments on news articles are going to largely be bots, it’s a waste of time.
      2. They do not care about being hypocrites. They are laughing with glee that they are winning and that you are losing, frustrated, angry, and scared.
      • Scrubbles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Exactly. Same with Meta platforms. You’re not fighting with a concept or an idea, this is their entire personality. They don’t care how horrid the viewpoint is, they’re just happy to be better than something. There’s a reason that it’s usually the poorest and lowest of our society, it’s because they want to feel better than people when they deep down know they’re not. It’s why it’s so hateful. It’s why they get joy even when it hurts themselves. They’re winning at something.

  • missingno
    link
    fedilink
    2412 months ago

    Remember that the far right has been desperately trying to label any LGBTQ-related content as ‘porn’. Educational resources? ‘Porn’. Biographies about gay people? ‘Porn’. Drag queens? ‘Porn’. A book about a boy with two mommies? ‘Porn’. Anything that acknowledges the existence of trans people? ‘Porn’.

    The purpose of this bill isn’t to ban porn, it’s to ban ‘porn’. Anything they don’t like will be deemed ‘porn’, and then this gives them the legal justification to ban whatever they want.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This pairs well with having to provide proof of age to browse to porn sites. Like fava beans with a nice chianti.