- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The 14 year old’s mother left an old laptop in a closet and now alleges it’s adult sites’ problem that he watched porn.
A Kansas mother who left an old laptop in a closet is suing multiple porn sites because her teenage son visited them on that computer.
The complaints, filed last week in the U.S. District Court for Kansas, allege that the teen had “unfettered access” to a variety of adult streaming sites, and accuses the sites of providing inadequate age verification as required by Kansas law.
A press release from the National Center for Sexual Exploitation, which is acting as co-counsel in this lawsuit, names Chaturbate, Jerkmate, Techpump Solutions (Superporn.com), and Titan Websites (Hentai City) as defendants in four different lawsuits.
You must log in or register to comment.
A this an actual law suit by an actual person? Isn’t the person named Jane doe or something?
Next: “I’m suing only fans bc my son is a paid supporter of my channel”
It’s honestly cringey to me thinking how it’s possible that the gen Alphas of tomorrow are likely to be in a timeline where their parents could very likely have porn floating on the internet. It’s just so f’d up to think about but my god I don’t get why people have this fascination with publicizing their sex life. It’s so gross. Ew ew
Reminded of that story of the mother who sent her (adult) son nudes to spread around his workplace and advertise her onlyfans for her.
If you don’t want to see people publicizing their sex life, then you can stay off OnlyFans and Fetlife. It’s not difficult.
That’s not the point, but ok…
Yup, it is. You think it’s gross. Then don’t seek it out.
No, it literally isn’t… but you can keep thinking that.
Cringey? Or just a generally more healthy and normalized societal view of sex and sex work?
I hope you understand I’m not strictly speaking of porn “stars”… amateur content counts.
gen alpha are obssesed with being influencers, im not kidding. and alot of reports of them using AI to do all thier essay writing or work.
-i think people are misinterpreting this comment, they are obsessed with growing up to be one.
The oldest gen alphas were born 15 years ago. What 14-year-old influencer do you know about?
obssessed with growing up to be one.
Yeah because video recording equipment didn’t get invented until about 10 years ago.
Who has heard of VCRs, not me, they sound like a myth
Point taken, but not very likely the same magnitude as what’s coming or is potentially already out there. Smart phones make it too easy now. It’ll only get worse…
I mean the fascination is with money. People are looking for ways to pay their rent.
A victimless crime?
Yeah but flip the gender and see how it sits
Like, a girl jaggin’ in the closet and daddy sues the porn company?
Sits the same for me?
What am I missing here?
I’m not getting your point. Why does it matter if it’s a girl enjoying porn?
This Karen probably won’t explain sex to her kids, so they have to get info in other ways.
“Oh no, my little girl found our unsecure laptop and used it to enjoy porn using Chaturbate.”
Yeah I still don’t see how it’s the platform’s problem that that mom failed to lock the laptop. And I feel really bad for her kid, for having such a Karen for a mom.
I didn’t say it was the platforms problem. The topic was how the boy wasn’t a victim. So you go on to say that the girl WOULD be a victim (to her mother) proving my point.
The boy would definitely also be his mom’s victim, but please note what I said: “I feel really bad for her kid for having a Karen for a mom.”
That you read that to only mean “girl” is not my problem. As far as I know, her kid is not a girl, but a boy.It’s funny because we don’t even disagree. Your first comment isn’t even related to the topic and your second is arguing a moot point. But go off I guess.
It depends on what you consider the crime to be. Is it the mom outing her kid’s porn habits or the kid using a platform in the way it’s meant to be used, but not by kids of his age?
If it’s the latter, I’d argue that is a victimless crime. If it’s the former, then yes, the kid (male or female) would be the victim.
Well I’d hate to assume what OP meant by “crime” but whatever it was certainly wasn’t victimless.
I don’t think either of your options for “crime” here make sense. The root problem isn’t the porn site. Or “outing” the kid. It’s that kids probably don’t need unrestricted access to the entire internet. All mom had to do was put a password on the laptop.
Victimless? Every sperm is sacred!
The victim is probably the porn industry in this case. An unsecured laptop on an unsecured network is a porn machine. They had a porn machine in their house the whole time. This makes about as much sense as suing Jack Daniels because your kid got drunk when you went away and didn’t lock up your booze.
Man imagine having your goon receipts be public court record at 14.
Also the National Center on Sexual Exploitation is exactly what you’d expect: a bunch of Catholic loons trying to legislate their moral dysfunction upon the country.
I’d genuinely die if the amount of times I got off to femboys while pretending to be straight got out when I was 14 .
The more I think about it the less funny it is.
A particularly vulnerable teen would consider suicide, from the bullying if not the embarrassment.
We laugh, but that mom is the kind of person that wholeheartedly supports the ‘You must provide proof of age to access adult sites’ laws that’re poised to ruin the internet.
I believe lawsuits like this are purposefully manufactured to try and elevate this narrative. She certainly wants the world to operate like what you bring up. The more stories like this pop-up, the more conservative parents will be scared and push for legislation.
deleted by creator
And all because she’s too lazy and / or too incompetent to properly parent her child. If you really think something is dangerous for your kid, you’re the number one person responsible to keep them away from it.
How could it be my fault my kid got hit by a car? The government built the street in front of my house!
I consider that analogy somewhat different. Being able to leave your home to travel safely is a basic human right. Cars on roads are inherently dangerous, even if you try to be defensive as a pedestrian. You can be sitting in your grassy front yard and vehicles can come crashing in to kill you. That happens on a regular basis in the US. You can be walking on the sidewalk and have a car run you down. The vision of kids running into the street to be hit isn’t the only risk, merely existing is. Hell, there’s plenty of people killed in their home by cars crashing into their houses!
Car crashes are the #2 reason for children’s deaths in the US (#1 is now guns, it was cars until about 3 years ago). It’s the #3 reason for adults to die after heart disease and cancer. Those stats are actually low balling it because we’re finding the noise and pollution from cars jacks up many of the other categories (including heart disease, cancer, dementia). Living by car roads is just inherently dangerous, regardless of how you try to teach your kids to avoid being run down in their own neighborhood.
The government building car only infrastructure, I feel, is an immoral and murderous act against the public. It’s categorically different from the parental preference of whether your 14 year old manages to see some porn using a computer you bought on an Internet connection you installed.
The government building car only infrastructure, I feel, is an immoral and murderous act against the public.
It ought to be considered malpractice on the part of the civil engineers.
The government should be paying millions of dollars to the family every time someone dies of car.
Or because a lawyer approached her about it…
Maybe they can countersue for her negligence in leaving the laptop unsecured…
The right wings infatuation with the government needing to parent for them. Tucker opening to an audience with “Daddy’s coming home” and talking about how the left thinks of the government as being the nanny state (how much protection??)
Eminem had it right, “shouldn’t you have been watching him? Apparently you ain’t parents”
It’s always projection.
Admin already wanna ban porn, I’d be surprised if they didn’t use this to push that agenda
Well, they want to ban LGBTQIA+ people. This is just the infrastructure they intend to use.
Once it’s in place, they’ll simply declare any media about people they hate “obscene”.
The porn ban is more focused on banning trans people. They have been systematically redefining LGBTQ+ people as pornographic, especially trans people. So if they manage to ban porn, they can use that to wipe any and all LGBTQ+ representation. Gay romance novel? Banned cuz it’s porn. Two female characters happened to hold hands? Banned cuz it’s porn. Trans people existing in public? Banned cuz it’s porn.
If only there was a person that’s supposed to care for and watch over this kid.
Oh son, what are you doing there…?
/scnr
Uncle Sam, right?
/s
Nope, this child is already born, should have stayed in the womb, that ungrate.
SOCIALISM REEEEEE
Imagine watching porn like everybody else and now your mom sues multiple billion dollar porn companies and everyone around you will know about her idea to do so…
When I was in 5th grade my mom tried to have a teacher fired for something and I was teased about it every day until I went to high school in a different town years later. This poor kid will never hear the end of it.
high school in the early 90’s. (trade school, granted) was great. doom on pcs after school with big 80’s era speakers echoing the shots in the halls. teachers who let us experiment. (electronics was my trade) with things like booze and “what happens if we fill every outlet with 12v electrolytic caps and turn the power back on?”
learned a lot from that guy.
he died early 2000’s from alcoholism. sigh.
“As you can see from these logs, my son viewed ChixWithDix_69 three times on Tuesday, once on Wednesday and two more times on Thursday, and I can see from my smart home lightbulb logs from the bathroom that he viewed them to completion.”
At the schoolyard:
So my mom commented on my tiktok dance, cringe!
You think that’s cringe, I borrowed the laptop and now my mom is suing a bunch of porn companies.
These are boiler plate lawsuits by the religious right. No rational person would blame the porn sites for being a shit parent.
So they want us to use our ID card every time we use the Internet now?
The better to track us.
shes the one paying for the isp, and should be monitoring his internet usage. just shut it off at certain times of the day when your not home, or when hes not doing hw.
Yeah… this 100% is just about trying to make some cash.
Her logic is, “I was a bad neglectful parent so now you must pay.” Nonsense.
Who shit myself
I didn’t know you could do this. I’m gonna sue all the porn sites for mental health sex life or something like that.
Only 30 times? As a former teenage boy, bullshit.
