• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141 month ago

    If one of them says, “Well Harris was/would be worse!”, explain the concept of Schodinger’s Cat to them; in a universe where Harris was never President, you can’t say shit about what she would have done.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 month ago

    I like how even mainstream politicians openly cuss now but we still censor their shit in online news articles… Whos fucking sensibilities are they worried about offending exactly if they dont censor words?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 month ago

      I had a theory during Covid that if I would be able to embarass the shit out of anti-vaxers on Nextdoor, that they’d stop showing up and spreading bad info. I never got to check / test / confirm any results to what I was (completely unscientifically) doing; but this is a great article to make me feel like I am getting a pat on the back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I have big narc tendencies and lemme tell ya that shit would kill me. The only point I am saying this is to harden the fuck up through some niche forum so that ‚public embarrassment’ doesn’t feel like dying anymore.

      It kinda worked. But it took a lot of trolling like a lot and multiple bans on any possible social media you can imagine to shape oneself into someone more resistant to words.

      First gain resistance by learning to say whatever shit is on your tongue and feel nothing about consequences and then come back to reason and you feel like unlocking superpower. Finally not shaped by others but being more of a rock staying solid and unaffected by external factors whatever happens.

      The hardest battles are those we fight with ourselves

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        I know you’re getting down votes, but I appreciate your honesty and willingness to do some introspection. Good on ya.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s a bit of tomfoolery to be honest. I have no idea what I written here but it sounds like ramblings of a lunatic the logic of who made some perverse sense few hours ago but it is too emphemeral to understand after some time passes.

          I am method acting comments on lemmy for some reason, looking to see what happens I guess

          The thing is I could craft a perfect comment that would be likeable but what would that give me other than empty dopamine?

          It’s far more interesting to go against this desire of validation and see what happens.

          Can we truly free ourselves from the need to conform? Is it possible?

          Nothing I have written recently was written to please an audience. Maybe I have done too much to the other side now, to irritate the audience but that’s how you seek those ways.

          All that effort to stop audience in defining who you are and seek authenticity. To stop “being perceived” as the prime factor in “being”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 month ago

      If we look at the common exhibitionist subtype of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) that most people think of when they hear the term narcissist, it is fairly easy to see that they use a simple three-part defense to create a façade of extreme self-confidence. I call this the “GOD defense.”

      G – Grandiosity: They act as if they are special and entitled to do or say whatever they want. Grandiose motto: “I am special.”

      O – Omnipotent: They make all sorts of unrealistic claims about how powerful and knowledgeable they are. Omnipotent motto: “I can do anything, and I know everything worth knowing,”

      D – Devaluing: They feel free to attack and devalue anyone who is not clearly above them in their status hierarchy. Devaluing motto: “You are worthless, defective garbage, and are here to serve me.”

      Yeah, you could just put “Example: Donald Trump” on all three.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A prediction: Walz might be the George Washington of the Founding Parents for a Free States of America. Unlike most of our leftish politicians, he has some military experience and seems inclined to fisticuffs. Maybe Mark Kelly as well.

    We are going to need that sort of person, who is willing to lead and fight by example.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      261 month ago

      We need people who do not care if they piss off the wealthy. People willing to forcefully and lawfully remove money from politics. People willing to challenge their own party members and even party leaders.

      Primary every federal office in every election until the comfy incumbent lives in fear.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If you don’t fight from a losing position, what incentive does anyone have to put you to win a winning when it is voting time? Counting on the Trump admin being awful enough for people to vote Dem is way too risky. Fight and inspire. Build collation and prepare to rebuild a new vision. You can’t just offer return to neoliberal politics is not the answer either. You’ll just restart the cycle over again for the next Trump.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They didnt fight from a winning position, and they still blame the voters. Short of some kind ofcoup in the party, they will keep trying to be republican-lite while working with Republicans, and then complain when Republicans vote for the real things and people who dont like Republicans simply dont vote, again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    91 month ago

    Nah, they don’t want to become a target. They’ll wait until it blows up on the streets, then point and say ‘see?’. Meanwhile, the public is waiting for the congressmen to do something. It’s something to watch.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    361 month ago

    I’ve said this for a while now. You want to make a dent? You go after the ego.

    Picture this: an endless stream of totally “realistic” phone-recorded AI videos of Trump playing golf. He lines up the putt—misses. Tries again—air ball. It’s literally an inch away now—misses again. Doesn’t blink, just traps it in, smirks, walks off like he nailed it. Over and over.

    The key is subtlety. These can’t look staged or flashy—make them feel like someone’s nephew filmed it from the cart. Make it look like he’s genuinely terrible but thinks he’s crushing it.

    Then blast them everywhere. Flood the algorithm. Turn his “I’m the best at golf” schtick into a punchline.

    This is how you use AI to actually take Trump down—with a thousand tiny ego papercuts.

  • defunct_punk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 month ago

    Ain’t it something how seemingly every Dem in power grew a spine the second after they handed Trump the White House?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 month ago

      Yeah no shit.

      Oh, should we bully the Nazis now?

      Pity we wasted four years NOT throwing Cheetolini in prison where he belongs, before he was able to do all the damage he has done.

      • defunct_punk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Right?

        “THE MIGRANTS ARE POISONING THE BLOOD OF AMERICA

        “Erm, anyone else think these guys are wEiRd???” 🤓🤓

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart
      link
      fedilink
      181 month ago

      Who grew a spine?

      Cory Booker’s long speech?

      What I think is funny is that the dems tried hard with good policies and overwhelmingly got voted out and no people are wondering why they aren’t doing anything.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 month ago

        Exactly.

        The senate is particularly bad. Schumer is basically MIA and is effectively rolling over because thinks letting republicans get everything they want somehow looks good for him.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart
          link
          fedilink
          91 month ago

          They don’t have the votes in the senate either so I’m guessing the strategy is let the GOP do what they want until midterms and point out how bad things are getting for the average American at that point.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            They don’t have the votes to pass a law, they do have the votes to stop laws from being passed. Further, the Republicans just killed a rule that allows 30 senators to block all bills by challenging executive decisions. The Republicans killed the rule to roll back a Biden admin decision to allow California stricter emission standards. Every challenge requires a mandatory 10h of debate. There are about 100 years worth of Trump admin decisions Dems can challenge to block the upcoming budget bill.

            Will they do that? Probably not, because they rolled over on the CR when they could have easily filibustered it.

            And yes, Schumer knows about this, he wrote an open letter warning Republicans not kill the rule.

            This is what I hate about the Democrats. They’ll happily roll over, yet I guarantee you the Republicans will abuse the hell out of this rule if a Dem president gets into office.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        They did a shit job of explaining their good policies in soundbites people could understand.

          • snooggums
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 month ago

            Obama’s campaigns were fairly successful at selling good policies as soundbites. The party did a shit job of following through.

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart
              link
              fedilink
              41 month ago

              Obama was and still is great at speeches.

              The only people who thought his campaign was one of soundbites are the terminally online.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141 month ago

    DAMMIT! We WERE going to have Him RUN for President but now we need to Find Someone ELSE! Is Charlie Kirk’s pal GAVIN NEWSOM around?

    -The DNC LITERALLY!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 month ago

        When did I say that? The election had abysmal turnout, and most non-voters say something along the lines of “both sides are the same”. The most effective way to fight back against that narrative is to…actually not be exactly like the other side. Yet the Dems just couldn’t forgo a few million in bribes and actually be materially different on key campaign issues.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      I think that’s a bit simplistic. I think Biden’s position on Gaza hurt turnout, but at the very most, that would mean Trump would win the electoral vote only rather than both the electoral and popular votes. There were several other reasons, e.g. the economy, Biden not bowing out earlier, Harris not putting some separation between them, etc. that ultimately doomed them.