• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14027 days ago

      The oath clearly states you’ll follow legal orders of the officers above you. I would like to think when I was in the military I would refuse to follow these illegal orders. In reality I have no idea what I would do. It would be a long legal battle and potentially life ruining event to do the right thing.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1227 days ago

        I mean the oath is to defend the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic and then gets into obeying orders.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8327 days ago

        Soldiers aren’t lawyers either. So you’d have to be super confident in your knowledge of the law to risk discharge or imprisonment.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          Yeah, for most things. But when it comes to fighting your own citizens, it feels pretty cut and dry. But again, this is easy for me to say now that I’m not wearing the uniform anymore.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1026 days ago

            I appreciate your honesty. People make it sound so easy to do the right thing but when you’re in a group like the military where conformity is pretty much a matter of life and death, it’s like a very hard decision to make.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2226 days ago

          The USMC has a chain of command whose job it is to know this shit. They let those Marines down and have stained the honor of the Corps.

          The writing has been on the wall since at least last February or whenever it was trump replaced so much of the DoD top brass. This was always what - in his first term he tried to send troops to Oregon and the DoD correctly told him “no”. Those people are replaced with scum who don’t mind violating the Posse Comitatus Act.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          125 days ago

          If they are acting illegally, they could in theory face state charges for assault and battery. In theory. Because they have no arrest powers. Maybe. Right? That’s the tricky point.

          So they would have to be super confident to not find out the scope of their authority.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4227 days ago

        Thank you for being honest about it. A different thread over the same topic people were saying it’s very simple and military should be able to easily disobey these illegal orders. Reality is much different. I know it’s very scary to potentially throw your life away to do the right thing and no one can truly say what they would do in this type of situation without actually living it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2927 days ago

          Yeah, you’re talking about potentially getting a dishonorable discharge making it super hard to get another good job and potentially going to military prison. It’s an insanely hard situation to be in. The guilt you’ll live with for following orders or having life long economic ruin. I’m just so glad I’m not in the military anymore.

      • Capt. Wolf
        link
        fedilink
        1327 days ago

        “Be a good little crayon eater, maggot, and do as you’re told unless you want to end up in there with them.” -Commanding officer, probably

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            926 days ago

            The hotline is for service members if they are directly given an illegal order, not for civilians to report service members.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              425 days ago

              Right. And again, they’re already carrying out those orders in front of the entire world.

              Who does the complaint go to that isn’t already well aware?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          226 days ago

          Yeah, I would have definitely called it. However, far too many people are too proud to reach out for help.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        225 days ago

        In my country there’s a thing called court martial. I guess it’s the same in the US. So if a soldier disobeys it’ll probably be that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          225 days ago

          Yep, exactly the same. The military has its own set of laws called the Uniform Code of Military Justice. You can be court martialed for breaking the UCMJ.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1327 days ago

      yeah, aside from all of the other bs (which is a lot) it’s just treating the marines like a personal toy

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      125 days ago

      I can’t stop thinking of the contrast between charged-up Americans willing to fight, kill, and die in a shitty battlefield for our freedoms but when our freedoms are being destroyed as the main attraction these guys are nowhere.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2927 days ago

      Troops who invade our country and do violence to our people are our enemy, no matter what flag they fly or uniform they wear. Fuck these scum.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2727 days ago

    Reuters images showed Marines apprehending a civilian, restraining his hands with zip ties and then handing him over to civilians from the Department of Homeland Security.

    Asked about the incident, the U.S. military’s Northern Command spokesperson said active duty forces “may temporarily detain an individual in specific circumstances.”

    “Any temporary detention ends immediately when the individual(s) can be safely transferred to the custody of appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel,” a spokesperson said.

  • Guy6758
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9927 days ago

    Oh hey look more blatantly illegal shit from orange leader

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      orange leader

      Ah hem, refer to him with the respect the office deserves.

      It’s Mustard Mussolini to you peasant.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      This is what the NRA have been waiting for, is it not? Let’s just watch them leap into action to safeguard constitutional rights against an oppressive regime.

      Any minute now.

      Any minute now.

      Here they come! Oh, sorry it’s a pigeon.

      It must be soon.

      Hmm…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      427 days ago

      I’m sure someday there will be consequences for all these heinous crimes. Might even be the same day my flying unicorn crashes into a supermodel and we go out to lunch and figure out cold fusion together on the back of a napkin.

  • partial_accumen
    link
    fedilink
    4027 days ago

    “Any temporary detention ends immediately when the individual(s) can be safely transferred to the custody of appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel,” a spokesperson said.

    Coming soon:

    “Day 3650, we’ll transfer you to an appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel soon, prisoner.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      They can’t perform arrests. They can only temporarily detain them with zip ties and transfer them by van to the police station.

      • partial_accumen
        link
        fedilink
        326 days ago

        What is their documented legal definition of the length of “temporarily detain”?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          225 days ago

          Depending on the state, you may detain someone in the process of a crime until law enforcement can take them. I know in Texas, civilian arrest powers are very similar to police.

          Being active military throws a huge wrench in this, however, as well as being ordered to a place and deployed with the purpose of policing. You can’t just throw up a “this is federal property” defense, because this is also a public building.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    I hope they ultimately meet a similar fate or find early graves rather than act as traitors. Rest in piss redneck trash, there’s no honor or valor involved.

    “Just doing their job” I hope somebody tells them the same while disappearing them to somewhere I won’t give a flying fuck about. May your partners be slutted out and your children die before you.

    • kersploosh
      link
      fedilink
      2027 days ago

      That was my first thought. Where are all the self-described Libertarians who should be losing their shit over this? They should be in the street screaming “posse comitatus!” at the tops of their lungs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9327 days ago

    So … the US Army is now an occupying force, and the Second Amendment crowd will activate to save us?

    • jawa22
      link
      fedilink
      1626 days ago

      OK. This needs to be said. Not every 2A adherant is a magat or a republican. There are many of us actual leftists that are armed and getting ready to actually fight this shit. The NRA != every armed American, and the time for leftists failing to be armed is long gone. Dems have been fighting against an actual armed left for decades because they love their capitalism. It is time to mobilize for real.

      • lemonaz
        link
        fedilink
        926 days ago

        That was yesterday. Today they’re assassinating them in their homes. I’m worried about tomorrow.

    • cyborganism
      link
      fedilink
      English
      527 days ago

      Everybody in the US is technically a 2nd amendment person. what are you waiting for?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      You had me in the first half.

      The 2a crowd isn’t likely to save you, they’re watching Fox and Friends.

  • who
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    “They’re just doing their job,” said Leao,

    No, Marcos, I don’t think they are.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1527 days ago

      I read the article. He crossed a yellow taped off area of the building perimeter.

      He was a vet headed into the building for some reason and the marines stopped him, detained, turned over, and he was then released.

      The guy didn’t seem to phased by it. Overall I’d give it a 5/7.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    725 days ago

    What would happen if someone were to detain a group of marines (with the minimal force necessary), in the wrong assumption - honest mistake - that they were about to execute illegal orders?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      225 days ago

      You ever come across the hornet’s nest that you need to clear, where they can sting you multiple times and aren’t really afraid all that much of dying.

      Unless they’re willing this is probably notably worse

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      425 days ago

      They’re trained and equipped in a way that you are not. I do not expect this to succeed unless you’ve already convinced them that they want to surrender.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        225 days ago

        While they have the physical ability to resist, they don’t have the legal right. They are subject to the same laws as anyone in the US.

        In fact, they might be commanded to stand down and accept it, because the legal implications of acting like an occupying force would have long term, very bad effects for the existence of the marines.

        While that might sound far fetched, the marine corps is smart, and would allow a few soldiers to face some humiliation and risk the government that funds them thinking “what if that was my kids?”

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          125 days ago

          They’re deployed in the hope of producing a massacre that can be blamed on the victims. I do not recommend counting on their leadership ordering a surrender