• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2112 days ago

    This is NOT true! The ONLY Reason he Won was because we DIDNT have Elon Musk Backing us or make our Platform CLEAR enough! Next time we’ll spend BILLIONS of Dollars LETTING people know we WONT do ANYTHING to Improve Their Lives! THAT will bring them RUSHING back to Us!

    -Chuck Schumer and The DNC!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4012 days ago

    Ehhh zorhan primary win is more like first big hurtle. Now ZOHRAN has to deal with belligerent part of democratic party and independent runs

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2112 days ago

      He already has, up to this point. In fact, big parts of the party tried to support his competition. They failed. He’s another in AOC mould. He may be good or great but there is an increasing trickle of progressive candidates.

      The more that win by being good the more that can win without being so good. He may not be the Dems saviour but he’s a step in the right direction and a worrying sign for Republicans and establishment politicians.

      • oh_
        link
        fedilink
        1412 days ago

        Indeed, they dusted off big Bill Clinton even.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        412 days ago

        Yeah I’m just saying there’s a lot more to go even in this race alone. Just because ZOHRAN WON the primary that doesn’t mean the Democrats leadership will be happy about it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      511 days ago

      AOC is going to need allies and a progressive coalition. We need to change the composition of the party from within in exactly this way. We just need way more of it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1012 days ago

    Lets see if you get a President Mamdani in a decade or two. It would be a change for the better.

    • Logi
      link
      fedilink
      511 days ago

      He can’t run for president since he wasn’t born American.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 days ago

        That is a downside, indeed.

        Nonetheless, I seriously hope he has the impact on American politics he deserves. Maybe he is the GOP-killer the US so desperately needs.

    • Maeve
      link
      fedilink
      211 days ago

      Assuming it’s not another bait and switch Dem like Fetterman and Sinema.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1011 days ago

    Every time something hopeful like this appears I start wondering if it’s safe to imagine that maybe things could get better here in the US. But so far I’ve been disappointed over and over. Part of me wants to just skip over the “maybe something good will happen” part and get right to the “oh, well, looks like he was assassinated by a blackwater hit squad” part. Money is power. The donor class gets what they want. And I have no faith that working within the electoral system will fix that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I start wondering if it’s safe to imagine that maybe things could get better

      It’s always safe to imagine. Imagining is the first step to a better place to live. But the dream can’t live in your head forever. At some point, you need to take action.

      I have no faith that working within the electoral system will fix that.

      Mobilizing a large group of activists around a set of tangible and popular goals is its own reward, whether or not the electoral system is accommodating to the politician’s success.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2112 days ago

      Dems are cooked. Nobody is buying the old guard bullshit anymore. Embrace populism or go the way of the Whigs

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        912 days ago

        Maybe, probably. They are going to gamble that they can stay the same because people are/will be so mad about… well everything.

        They can prop up a white male moderate with an ounce of charisma, someone that is around 45. People will be refreshed that this candidate speaks in complete sentences and the capacity for empathy – like a real person.

        That’s what they want, business as usual sold as a revolutionary idea. Will people buy it? Who knows… groups of people are pretty dumb.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          312 days ago

          They are going to gamble that they can stay the same because people are/will be so mad about… well everything.

          They will 100% try to do this, but they’ll end up losing and then blame the voters they’re maligning. Mamdani is a case-in-point difference between status quo candidate turnouts and progressive candidate turnout. The 7% delta over Cuomo is the 7% they’ll lose if they try it again.

  • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3912 days ago

    I’m no political scientist, but I’d think he needs to win the general before this can be said.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      412 days ago

      It’s indicative of a deep, irreversible rift in the party. Either democrats adapt or they split in half.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2512 days ago

    I wish. It’s a clear message from the constituency, but no one ever blamed the DNC for listening ti their voters too much.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      612 days ago

      Either they listen to their voters and become a ‘new’ democratic party, or they’ll continue bleeding numbers and die. Either way, it’s still the beginning of the end.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    1312 days ago

    And may it pisses off the MAGA crowd like nothing else.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9412 days ago

    I’m afraid it’s too late though.

    It’s possible - arguably even likely - that the Dem establishment still won’t get the message and will instead continue to try to con us into supporting corrupt neolib hacks and will continue to undermine actual leftists.

    In fact, I sort of half expect the New York party to abandon Mamdani and instead back a write-in campaign for Cuomo.

    I wish I was kidding.

    Even if they show never-before-seen integrity and determination and actualy shift back toward supporting actual leftists (or get replaced by a new generation of leaders who will), I still think it’s likely going to be too late. The longer Trump and his ilk remain in office, the more likely it becomes that opposing them will just get you on the next flight to some overseas concentration camp, or dead, or both.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2712 days ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if the establishment decides open corruption is pretty cool actually and starts trying to rehabilitate Adams’ image. Seems like trying to run both Adams and Cuomo is a fools errand and Adams is stubborn enough to stay in regardless so they’ll have to go with him.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      1012 days ago

      It is too late for electoral politics to save democracy, if that’s what you’re talking about. People like Mamdani are important for the day after, but Trump will have to be deposed much like his ilk in Ukraine and Tunisia.

      • Default Username
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Maybe in our current state, where corruption can occur, but in a new, more democratic system where corruption can’t occur because no single person will have enough wealth or the financial incentive to be able to buy politicians.

        The problem isn’t electoral politics, but that we don’t live in a democracy.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          412 days ago

          I was talking more about the whole fascist takeover thing. The current batch of oligarchs and dictators has to go before you can fix anything anywhere, and by the next election cycle American democracy will be dead. The timeline simply doesn’t allow for an electoral solution.

          • Default Username
            link
            fedilink
            English
            312 days ago

            Ah, I thought you were talking about the concept of electoral politics in general and not this specific moment in the US.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1112 days ago

      The Democrats are going to try to ratfuck him, sure. They’re never going to get the message

      But this is how we clean them out. This is why AOC and Bernie are doing rallies - so that every seat that comes up is filled with a progressive. And this is a big seat

      As for it being too late… Yeah, we’re fucked. But we can still make things better. There’s no reason to yield ground, maga is incredibly incompetent - they can be beat.

      And there will be an after

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      512 days ago

      Yeah hope has security detail. I worry ICE going grab him and disappear him. Especially if it looks like he will win the general election.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 days ago

      Though I dont endorse accelerationism, when presented with that scenario accelerationism may be the only path forward. You cant keep hobbling for decades, slowly losing and falling further behind. It may be necessary to do what the nation is doing now: losing so that everyone can be reminded of what they had and what they want instead of being blissfully ignorant of both.

      • Lightor
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Looks like they already beat you. They want people to give up. You’re willingness to roll over accept defeat doesn’t reflect how the rest of us feel.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      912 days ago

      Republicans will control the supreme court for the next 20 years. We will see couple of resignations soon so they can appoint younger, crazier judges. Hopefully progressive democrats will be able to stop the slide towards dictatorship but I don’t except any swinging back.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        311 days ago

        Democrats won’t get control of the Senate until 2029 January 3rd since the only seat the democrats can win in 2026 election is Maine and its currently 53-47, everything else is locked in place by the staggered election system of the Senate.

        Winning the House can’t stop the Judicial appointments that only the Senate has the power to reject