Electric bikes are a menace. They go almost as fast as a car (if the car is parking), they’re whisper…

  • teft
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73 days ago

    If you think electric bikes are bad, you’re a fucking idiot.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I have bad knees and no drivers license in the United States. My electric bike is a life saver.

    Edit: Just read the whole “article”. I don’t disagree but sarcasm isn’t a good tone for journalism.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    94 days ago

    Let’s take New York City, for example. It’s got more e-bike usage than anywhere else in the US, and there are still only an average of two pedestrians per year killed by an e-bike accident. That number for cars? Around 100 per year in NYC. It’s not complicated math – cars are 50x more lethal in the city.

    I have no doubt that ebikes are less dangerous, but this data doesn’t do much to prove that point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      You have to do deaths per vehicle on the road. Raw data is useless for making any sort of comparison.

        • Annoyed_🦀
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 day ago

          Death per distance traveled shouldn’t be use on thing that usually travel short distance though, because pedestrian death is the highest if measured this way, making the impression that walking is dangerous.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 days ago

          Yeah, I think both metrics are valuable. Also the ratio of incidents where pedestrians did/didn’t die might be useful.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “there are still only an average of two pedestrians per year killed by an e-bike accident. That number for cars? Around 100 per year in NYC. It’s not complicated math – cars are 50x more lethal in the city.Around 100 per year in NYC.”

    Since the articles author chose to be so pedantic about it: There are about 65,000 e-bikes in NYC, and about 2,000,000 cars. The math is simple. There’s way more car deaths because there’s way more cars. If you adjust the numbers make cars and ebikes equal and assume the too small value of 2 ebikes deaths to be a statistical average, it would amount to 2 ebike deaths for every 3.3 car deaths.

    So yes, ebikes are definitely less deadly, but hardly less deadly than the screwball claim of 50x less.

    If a guy riding a unicycle backwards down a NYC street with a fanny pack full of nitroglycerin fell down and blew up, I guess I can tell everyone it’s only half as deadly to ride a unicycle backwards while carrying nitro, since there was only a single fatality while doing it.

  • Pearl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64 days ago

    It’s too late. Elastigirl already showed off how cool they are

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74 days ago

    Literally nobody will read (or even glance at) the article and instead respond to the headline based on vibes alone. As usual. Ah, social media… Electric bikes were definitely a better invention.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64 days ago

    Here’s an idea: If we want safer streets, how about we start by addressing the machines that weigh two and a half tons and can hit 100 mph, not the ones that top out at 20 or 28 and are powered by a one-horsepower motor the size of an orange.

    This made me chuckle on the train. Hilarious, but true. I like the orange comparison.