ModerateImprovementcake to [email protected] • 1 year agoOhio GOP Senator Says 'Civil War' Needed If Trump Loses.www.commondreams.orgexternal-linkmessage-square183fedilinkarrow-up1687cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1687external-linkOhio GOP Senator Says 'Civil War' Needed If Trump Loses.www.commondreams.orgModerateImprovementcake to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square183fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish394•1 year agoSuggesting that a war should be waged against the democratically-elected government of the United States seems… Well, it seems kinda treason-y to me. Just a smidge.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink235•1 year agoHey now, treason is very specifically defined in the constitution. Oh and yeah, that’s the constitutional definition. This is treason.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish119•edit-21 year agoTo be fair, we have been very lenient with traitors lately. To the surprise of no one, treason becomes increasingly popular. This is why we should have met treason aggressively and swiftly from the beginning.
minus-squaremad_asshatterlinkfedilink61•1 year agoSCOTUS allows treason if it’s an official act peculiar only to Trump.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•1 year agoRepublicans can have a little treason. As a treat.
minus-squareÆnimalinkfedilink9•1 year agoYou’ve heard of first treason, but what about second treason?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 year agoAmericans have been giving these folks too much rope. When will they start using the rope?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoShould have done it his first month in office. Trials for the January 6th crew? Should have been immediate, not taking 4+ years.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish22•1 year ago To be fair, we have been very lenient with traitors lately. Lately? We have been lenient since the last civil war!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•1 year agoHey treason is when Democrats do anything I don’t like which means anything
minus-squareCatmalinkfedilink36•1 year agoIts only real treason if it comes from the Treasony region of France. Otherwise its just called being a rebel.
minus-squarehopesdeadlinkfedilink1•1 year agoBut you need either that person or two witnesses to admit to it in a court in order to convict.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•1 year agoYeah this kinda does seem like it might cross the line and be actionable
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 year agoTechnically yes, but it’s really just semantics and treason sounds sexier.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoDoing the definition of treason is AT LEAST treason-adjacent!
Suggesting that a war should be waged against the democratically-elected government of the United States seems… Well, it seems kinda treason-y to me. Just a smidge.
Hey now, treason is very specifically defined in the constitution. Oh and yeah, that’s the constitutional definition. This is treason.
To be fair, we have been very lenient with traitors lately. To the surprise of no one, treason becomes increasingly popular.
This is why we should have met treason aggressively and swiftly from the beginning.
deleted by creator
Obligatory FUCK ANDREW JOHNSON.
SCOTUS allows treason if it’s an official act peculiar only to Trump.
Republicans can have a little treason. As a treat.
You’ve heard of first treason, but what about second treason?
What’s treasons, precious?
Americans have been giving these folks too much rope. When will they start using the rope?
Perhaps Biden’s “official” act is rope-a-dope.
Should have done it his first month in office.
Trials for the January 6th crew? Should have been immediate, not taking 4+ years.
Lately? We have been lenient since the last civil war!
Hey treason is when Democrats do anything I don’t like which means anything
Its only real treason if it comes from the Treasony region of France. Otherwise its just called being a rebel.
bubbling rebel
The Champagne virus is elusive.
But you need either that person or two witnesses to admit to it in a court in order to convict.
Yeah this kinda does seem like it might cross the line and be actionable
Isn’t this sedition, not treason?
Technically yes, but it’s really just semantics and treason sounds sexier.
I miss when that mattered…
Doing the definition of treason is AT LEAST treason-adjacent!