• JokeDeity
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Lol, reaching? In what way do you draw the conclusion that I am against TikTok for anything to do with capitalism? TikTok is a tool for the Chinese government to take user data while simultaneously providing nothing but brain rot to the consumers (of course, this isn’t the case with the Chinese version, it actually shows educational content). Eat shit, Pooh Bear.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      “Chinese government to take user data while simultaneously providing nothing but brain rot to the consumers (of course, this isn’t the case with the Chinese version, it actually shows educational content)”

      Isnt all the content on tiktok user-generated?

      • JokeDeity
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        Isn’t all the content on YouTube, Facebook, Reddit Lemmy, etc user created? It’s about the moderation. What gets deleted, what gets promoted, those are the things that are different.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      106 months ago

      Are American social media platforms not sharing data with the American government?

      They’re all the same, banning one is missing the point.

      • poVoq
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        No the government buys the data from them like everyone else 😏

      • JokeDeity
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        Cool thing I didn’t say “but Facebook is good and needs to stay” then, huh?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86 months ago

      that whole pooh the bear shit is racist as fuck in the first place. “Ahah the chinese guy is yellow ahah”.

      Do you also support comparing black people to monkeys?

      • JokeDeity
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        LMFAO, it’s because he looks like fucking Winnie the Pooh you dipshit. 🤣

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Of course he looks like Winnie the Pooh to you, you racist prick.

          The only thing you notice about a chinese guy is the color of his skin that’s pathetic

          • JokeDeity
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            LMFAO, you aren’t even a good troll. This is the most common and least effective style of trolling and it makes me laugh every time. Just quintuple down on everything, keep repeating yourself ad nauseum, I’m sure you’ll convince me that I’m a racist soon if you just keep trying! 🤣

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              “Ahah racist caricature so funny. Very lol”. The nazis had very funny caricatures of bignosed jews if you’re interested.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              Because I’m not a troll at all. You are the one denying the obvious. You find it funny to compare a chinese person to a yellow cartoon character, and what’s the humour beside sheer racism?

              • JokeDeity
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                If Winnie the Pooh was green and Asians had more of a red skin tone. They would still look alike. You’re the one obsessed with skin color here buddy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            And by that logic, black people are orange, I guess? Or maybe it’s about how much they look like the character and not what color they are.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      nm = never mind

      The intention was that I didn’t need your participation to make my point. But here we are. Thanks for the reinforcement!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        if you didn’t want to interact you could have just not posted anything. You want to do your point but you know it doesn’t hold any ground and cannot stand the slightest opposition so you bail.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      86 months ago

      If banning the harvest of user data was the real reason for going after tiktok, they would’ve banned harvesting user data. Meta infamously sells their’s to the highest bidder. Are you certain they don’t sell to China? They’ve been caught lying about what they do with it before

      • JokeDeity
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        Wild how two of you read what I wrote and inserted commentary about Meta that I never mentioned. Ban all of Meta too, please, I really mean it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          That’s my point! We can’t just have the government wack-a-moling businesses like that, that’s not impartial governing.

          • Scary le Poo
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            Why does the government need to be impartial when dealing with public health and safety?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Why does the government need to be impartial…

              …uuummm, because it’s fair and just? Ngl, I’m not sure how else to answer that because I’ve never heard somebody argue against fair and consistent application of the law before. Maybe I’m just being an idealist here, but when somebody compromises health and safety, they should get disciplined because it’s against the law to compromise health and safety; Not because they happened to catch the attention of Congress.

              Edit: Actually let me ask you because I need to know: Why shouldn’t the government be impartial in matters of health and safety? In what situations should the violations of health and safety by some parties be ignored and those of other parties be exaggerated? Because, you know, that’s what “partial” means.

              • JokeDeity
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                This mentality is how we get equality for neonazis and “bOtH sIdEs” arguments. I actually don’t give a shit if life isn’t fair and balanced for garbage people. I don’t want the government to be fair to everyone, I want it to protect it’s people from fascism and psyops.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  26 months ago

                  Let’s back up, I think we’re getting hung up on the semantics of the word “fair” here. I’m not asking for “equality”, I’m asking for the passage of rights and regulations protecting United States citizens from everything that TikTok is accused of, and then holding every company operating in the United States to that standard. I don’t want the government cherry-picking which companies they’ll protect us from, I want digital privacy rights to protect me from ALL of them!!! 👇 That’s impartial governing. 👇 That’s fair. Legislation singling out TikTok specifically is a pathetic bandaid solution at best, but I’m afraid that it’s really a dishonest abuse of power, and that it’s precedent will lead to more entities getting banned arbitrarily.

                  Don’t get me wrong, fuck TikTok, I don’t use it myself, but this legislation is clearly bullshit not written with our protection in mind, and I swear we’re seeing the Constitution erode before our eyes (you know, more than it already has).