@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 4 months agowell that's rudeprogramming.devimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up11.24K
arrow-up11.24Kimagewell that's rudeprogramming.dev@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink58•edit-24 months agoAt least it seems more “scientific” than anything that Jung ever did. https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•4 months agoYour source does not support your claim at all. Seems like you are projecting your scientific illiteracy onto Jung.
At least it seems more “scientific” than anything that Jung ever did.
https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/13027/is-there-a-reasonable-scientific-backing-for-carl-jungs-type-theories
Your source does not support your claim at all. Seems like you are projecting your scientific illiteracy onto Jung.