Exactly. In America, the supreme court is answerable to the president (Trump) who changes every four years on a whim of democracy which is fragile.
In the UK, everyone is answerable to the King who changes every few decades- and we always know who the next will be. And they don’t get involved in politics either.
The first step towards fascism would be to replace the King
Constitutional monarchy is based
As someone living in one, fuck that.
Someone being born out of one particular vagina shouldn’t determine his life as being able to dictate what I do!
That’s not a constitutional monarchy.
It is, because a constitutional monarch signs laws, thereby helping them become effective.
Laws are rarely, if ever blocked, provided everything is going well
Why? They’re answerable to no-one.
Exactly. In America, the supreme court is answerable to the president (Trump) who changes every four years on a whim of democracy which is fragile.
In the UK, everyone is answerable to the King who changes every few decades- and we always know who the next will be. And they don’t get involved in politics either.
The first step towards fascism would be to replace the King
They have a prime minister though?
The Lords can veto the prime minister if he intents to stop democracy. If the Lords are compromised, then the King can
Tell me you know nothing about British politics without telling me you know nothing about British politics.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_spider_memos
Not to mention that that’s a ridiculous viewpoint in the first place, everything and everybody is political.
So an heir apparent - not the monarch wrote a few minor letters to the government. That’s nothing compared to other people being corrupt.