@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 1 month agorace conditionslemmy.zipimagemessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up1780
arrow-up1780imagerace conditionslemmy.zip@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square84fedilink
minus-squarelime!linkfedilinkEnglish14•1 month agoonly true if your language compiles to c. fortran peeps are safe.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 month agoI’m an 80’s/90’s BASIC bitch, so I’m still irrelevant!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 month agoI thought it compiles to LLVM intermediate representation and then to the machine code of the requested platform arch. Am I missing something?
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoFortran is from 1957, LLVM is from 2003. It’s probably like C where there is a compiler tool chain that goes through LLVM like you describe and others that go directly to executables.
minus-squarelime!linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoonly if you design it using llvm. llvm is pretty new.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•1 month agoAh ok I was referring to Rust specifically. Thanks!
only true if your language compiles to c. fortran peeps are safe.
I’m an 80’s/90’s BASIC bitch, so I’m still irrelevant!
I thought it compiles to LLVM intermediate representation and then to the machine code of the requested platform arch. Am I missing something?
Fortran is from 1957, LLVM is from 2003. It’s probably like C where there is a compiler tool chain that goes through LLVM like you describe and others that go directly to executables.
only if you design it using llvm. llvm is pretty new.
Ah ok I was referring to Rust specifically. Thanks!
yeah but rednax wasn’t.