• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    117 days ago

    No, actually, but you clearly have very poor reading comprehension so it doesn’t seem like I’ll be getting through to you.

    Just know, when you use terms like strawman incorrectly you look fucking stupid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      116 days ago

      Okay, whatever you need to tell yourself little buddy.

      If ‘winning’ internet arguments is that important to you can go ahead and chalk this one up as a win if that makes you feel better about yourself. 😉

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        016 days ago

        whatever you need to tell yourself little buddy

        Projection, also imagine defaulting to this because you had your logic thrown in your face. Pathetic, this has nothing to do with ‘winning’ — it has everything to do with you just being wrong.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          116 days ago

          Lmao what logic did you throw in my face?

          You didn’t even address my point? You litterally just made up a completely different point and argued against that instead, because you only care about winning an argument and you couldn’t do that since my point was very obviously correct.

          Alumium is factually the original name. You can’t say that then say Americans use Aluminum because it’s the original name, because its not the original name, alumium is. That’s just basic logic. A statement of fact that you can’t argue against. But by all means feel free to make up a different argument that you can argue against little guy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            116 days ago

            Your point - the working title is the original name.

            My point - take anything with a title that may have had a working title, apply your logic to it.

            None of your words matter ‘little guy’, go back to Reddit.