• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      120 days ago

      I can see them with my own eyes right now. And the dress is black and blue, so I’m right. You just can’t see them, but don’t mistake your eyesight problems for objective truth.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        lol ok Neo.

        Unfortunately you’re unable to see the (objective) pixel representation :(

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          119 days ago

          In the larger version of the picture, you can see three areas of glare on the right. One from the window, one from the top of the table, and one from the floor. The backs of the items closer to the door, and the edge of the table, are darker than these glare areas. There’s also a bright spot on the left. If you have good spatial intelligence, you can clearly tell the glare is coming from the sun based on how the light falls in the room.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            119 days ago

            The College of Optometrists came out and said it was ambigious. It’s the point of the image dumbass. It’s not about good spatial awareness. All you’re demonstrating is lack of basic perception.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              119 days ago

              Ah yes, I lack perception because I can see more things than you do, and they lead me to correct conclusions about the state of the world. That makes complete sense.

              And Usain Bolt runs so fast because he has weak legs, obviously.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                You lack perception because your level of understanding is childish. I’d put you at 7/8. It’s really quite illuminating how thick some people can be.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  119 days ago

                  Most insults aren’t the same thing as an ad hominem fallacy. An insult is only an ad hominem when it’s the entire substance of one’s argument. Like you’re doing right now, shit-for-brains.