ByteOnBikes to Microblog [email protected]English • 9 days agoSorry bout your heartdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square177fedilinkarrow-up11.6K
arrow-up11.6KimageSorry bout your heartdiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes to Microblog [email protected]English • 9 days agomessage-square177fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish55•9 days agoI just woke up, but I don’t think the unit should be percentage per 100k people. Otherwise, I agree with the statement though.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish45•8 days agoNot only that, 07 > 5.7, I assume missing a decimal point. Their heart is in the right place, their keyboard is all over the place.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•8 days agoProbably this person studied in america /j
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•8 days agoYes am I unaware of a strange way of displaying these metrics or did they just add the % sign for no reason?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•8 days agoi’m pretty confident (p<0.05) they just added a % for no real reason.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•8 days agoJudging from the rest of the post, the person probably has issues with maths.
minus-squareNielsBohronlinkfedilinkEnglish6•9 days agoYeah, that seemed needlessly confusing to me too.
I just woke up, but I don’t think the unit should be percentage per 100k people. Otherwise, I agree with the statement though.
Not only that, 07 > 5.7, I assume missing a decimal point. Their heart is in the right place, their keyboard is all over the place.
Probably this person studied in america /j
Yes am I unaware of a strange way of displaying these metrics or did they just add the % sign for no reason?
i’m pretty confident (p<0.05) they just added a % for no real reason.
Judging from the rest of the post, the person probably has issues with maths.
Yeah, that seemed needlessly confusing to me too.