• Pennomi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    58 days ago

    Not only are they cheaper than AC, but doing the math shows that they are more energy efficient than a human doing the same work, since humans operate at around 80-100W, 24 hours a day. (Assuming that the output is worth anything, of course.)

    • lime!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      248 days ago

      let’s not use the term “efficiency” with humans making art, please. you’re not helping anyone with that argument, you’re just annoying both sides.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 days ago

        Humans at least run on renewable energy.

        The computer you draw your art on, not so much. Reject modern art, embrace traditional carvings and cave paintings!

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 days ago

        Oh for sure. But if (for example) an artist can save time by tracing over an SDXL reference image, that is energy-efficient as well as time-efficient, despite most people claiming the contrary.