• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    486 days ago

    More water and energy efficient to run, yes. If you have to replace them every couple of years the resources used to make new ones need to be included too though, and that will have a big impact on the comparison. That said, I have had a modern front load pair for at least 5 years now, no issues.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 days ago

        Of course. Those resources are just a much larger impact percentage wise on an appliance replaced every two years vs 25.

    • WolfmanEightySix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 days ago

      In the 2008 economic slump, the U.K. had something called a “car scrappage scheme”. Shit was the most wasteful thing ever. Also saw really cool classics cubed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 days ago

        USA had the same thing, “Cash for Clunkers”. Some of the cars we were better off getting rid of. Some of them not, whether because they were rare or classic, or old but still more fuel efficient than a truck or SUV. Sure increased the average price of a used car though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 days ago

          You could find driveable used cars for ~$700 before. Even accounting for inflation now, all you can find now are mechanic specials and parts only.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 days ago

      there are calculations and tables on exactly this, when a machine is to be replaced. Including production and shipment of a new one etc., some should be replaced. Look it up!