Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. In text, video and audio, our reporters explain politics, policy, world affairs, technology, culture, science, the climate crisis, money, health and everything else that matters. Our goal is to ensure that everyone, regardless of income or status, can access accurate information that empowers them.
“The katyn massacre begs to differ with your overall thesis” is such tortured awful writing that I hesitate to keep responding in order to walk you through every Timothy Snyder-tier pop history factoid lodged in your brain. It’s like talking to myself when I was 14 reading Robert Evans articles on Cracked. Let me know when you get through these, you’re welcome~ https://annas-archive.se/md5/9f9f3ebb076a7ed2d91f51d0e5440f20
https://annas-archive.se/md5/dbf40cb981d075d2ecfd00af5dad05d4
Sorry for disturbing you, you must be quite sensitive. I’m sure I’ll get around to those.
“Sensitive” to people shitting out sentences less meaningful than Colourless Green Ideas Sleep Furiously in my mentions while handwaving collaboration with Nazis as politically acceptable and common yes. You’re pestering me. I’ve been doing all of the lifting here and educating you. I don’t think you will read those. What was the last history book you read/documentary watched etc? What made you feel entitled to my time in the first place?
Meaning was pretty simple, you said something misleading, so I gave a piece of evidence to counter it. Pretty big massacre of Poles.
You are correct, I will probably not read those, I was being sarcastic. You’re pretty clearly severely biased, as well as just trying to be combative for combativeness’ sake, so I’m not particularly interested. Regarding me feeling entitled, you are here posting in a community that I subscribe to, so I do feel fully entitled to engage with you as a fellow user . Particularly when someone makes a claim, it is pretty common practice on the internet to challenge it, ask for a source, etc.
So why do you feel entitled to ask people for sources that you have no intention of examining? Couldn’t be a more clear-cut description of pseudointellectualism and concern trolling, you get all of your information from the same capital centers which supported fascism in Europe and prevented the destruction of it in the aftermath of the war. Read the books, don’t take up more of my time for attention like an annoying child.
I wasn’t asking you for a source. I was challenging your assertion with a piece of evidence. Those are two distinct activities. That should be fairly common sense.
Frankly, if you don’t want to be bothered, you should probably stay off the internet. It’s a rough world out there.
edit: Oh, and btw, the AfD is most successful in former East Germany, not West Germany. So who didn’t destroy it?
I am presenting you with criticism of the sources which you are referencing because I know more than you lmao, you have no right to reject them out of hand as “biased” because they don’t fit your original narrative. I am rejecting your unsubstantiated claims with better material. Quit having conversations with yourself and deflecting because you can’t handle being challenged
If you’re refuting my evidence, you should be able to type out a brief summary of your argument for why that massacre shouldn’t matter or whatever. A brief paragraph summarizing the most important point would be fine. That’s fairly traditional instead of just “go read this stuff”, which may or may not even fully pertain, knowing passionate ideologues on the internet.
No, go call your mother and stop begging me for attention. Engage with the material and come back. If you devoted a fraction of the energy you do to annoying people online to reading, you could eventually be as literate as the average Chinese teenager.
You are a complete piece of shit. You mist have terabites of child porn and snuff that FSB found out about or you are a bot.