Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. In text, video and audio, our reporters explain politics, policy, world affairs, technology, culture, science, the climate crisis, money, health and everything else that matters. Our goal is to ensure that everyone, regardless of income or status, can access accurate information that empowers them.
Right, you want an excuse to continue writing your bullshit without reading, that’s what I’m cutting you off from. The most entertaining aspect of this to me is you cannot even reference actual sources, just vague narratives you heard of and a Wikipedia page. Let me give you some advice: if you run into another person who actually reads, counter with your own recommendations. Even better, google a review of their book and bludgeon them with that. It seems you are so thrown off by being asked to read that you have no other move than to camp out in my replies asking for a summary. Has this never happened to you before?
Do you just not know what to do when asked to read before running your mouth? Your persistent reply guy behavior speaks for itself
Okay, that’s one of the silliest ideas I’ve ever heard. We’re supposed to internalize and integrate information, not just parrot whatever our authorities feed us. This is why I ask for your words, not the words of your teachers.
That is a horrible idea that will dull your independent thinking in the long run. Perhaps this has happened to you already. We are supposed to always consider thoughts separately from our elders, our countries and our teachers. This is very important. Without this we cannot be independent from our own traditions, our own narratives, our habits, etc. It’s not without dangers, but it’s a very important skill. We usually press it very heavily once you reach the university level. It’s not for the young, obviously, but very important for adults. It’s key to being able to be flexible, innovate and solve new problems.
It’s like you don’t believe in personally discussing information, which I still think is a flimsy excuse to cover for your weakness. You’re not willing to simply discuss because you simply can’t. You haven’t internalized the information.
Cool email begging for what we used to call “spoon feeding”. I’m taking you really seriously and about to start following your instructions, but I have one condition: you tell me the last book you read. Just the title is fine
Whatever you used to call it, we usually just call it discussion. Funny thing is, you’ve written pages and pages worth yourself in this thread, you could have easily saved yourself a ton of time with one brief paragraph yesterday.
Anyway, I just don’t believe you, I think you’re still just trolling. So, no, I’m uninterested in your conditions about me as a person or my habits. Either address the topic or do not.
Why don’t you ask an AI chatbot to summarize the books for you? It would clearly be more your speed.
I don’t use LLMs. Besides, I’m here because I enjoy discussing history with other people in history communities. You apparently are here for an entirely different reason, which I think is obvious to everyone.
Yeah you enjoy “discussing history” in the same way someone’s dad who got into Dan Carlin does. You’ve got nothing but bluster when challenged to think for yourself, instead of playing liberal trivia contest, because you don’t read. We both know you don’t read. History is in books, did you know that? There’s no “everyone” here lil bro
You really have no evidence for your insults, so they come across as very shallow. It’s pretty juvenile. All you really know is I’ve told you I won’t read your source, which I do understand upsets you.
Regardless of your holier-than-thou, elitist attitude, it doesn’t matter. Either people discuss or they don’t. You could discuss if you wished, but hiding behind this obvious cover of “you’re not good enough to bother with”, you won’t discuss history, while in a history community. This makes it very obvious you don’t really love history, you just want to use it as a tool for your own ends. It’s a political tool for you. This is extremely common, anyone who spends any time with it has encountered the phenomenon hundreds of times in both the present and a historical context.
There’s nothing beneficial about discussing history with somebody who is incapable of conducting a historical investigation. I think that most people should be able to answer a question such as the last book they read, their favorite color, what year it is, who’s president, where they are, and why it smells like toast. Do you catch my drift