• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Pretty clear pattern with the US states. The lowest death rates are decidedly blue and the highest are decidedly red.

    • dustycups
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Like Tal said, a confounder for that would be distances driven. There are probably similar ones like rural/uban populations etc. It would be great to see a study allowing for these.
      I couldn’t find one but I didnt look very hard.

      edit: coundn’t

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        109 days ago

        Death rates correlate with education levels, culture, urbanization rate, car size, driving laws, speed cameras and road design.

        • dustycups
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          In that order?

          edit: OK, so I actually watched the video: #1 was vehicle miles/kms travelled

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 days ago

          It’s miles driven per person. Wisconsin and Minnesota have ridiculous drunk driving rates, but they are middle of the pack.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 days ago

      Presumably, people drive more frequently and for longer distances in the red states. Everyone I know back in my home red state commutes between 30 minutes to an hour, sometimes more, everyday. They’re not sitting in traffic either.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I don’t know why you think people would spend any less time in traffic in blue states.

        Death rates correlate with education levels, culture, urbanization rate, car size, driving laws, speed cameras and road design.

        • pwnicholson
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          The main issue is distance (and speed), not time. Your far less likely to be in a fatal car crash (or crash out any kind) in slow-moving city traffic jams vs driving from your rural house to your job in the next small town doing 85 mph on a 2-lane highway, which is the scenario a lot of folks in rural areas have every day

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 days ago

            Death rates correlate with education levels, culture, urbanization rate, car size, driving laws, speed cameras and road design.

            • pwnicholson
              link
              fedilink
              English
              59 days ago

              Correlation is not causation. They never addressed speed or distance, which are clearly the biggest factors in the chances of fatality and the chances of having a wreck at all (respectively)

              • dustycups
                link
                fedilink
                English
                59 days ago

                From the video:

                I’m guessing that these are in order of correlation. I didn’t notice a source or follow up further.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              58 days ago

              From the linked source, #1 is miles driven. You can keep copy/pasting the same thing in response to people hypothesizing miles driven is the biggest cause, but it won’t change the fact that you are wrong.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 days ago

          It’s not time in traffic. It’s time NOT in traffic. Traffic is slow and not often deadly. Driving for an hour at 70mph is much more dangerous than an hour at 25mph.

          And blue states often have bigger cities with slower traffic and shorter commute distances.