… so you are a fool for thinking that ai confused a name and title even after having the article explain it… why would you “think” it’s confusing it when you know they aren’t? That’s being a fool lmfao.
Your opinion isn’t valid and makes you a fool since the “facts” show that it didn’t happen. Not everything is Ai just because you don’t understand it… again…
Why are you arguing so badly that this is Ai and the only defense is either not reading the article or just ignoring the obvious…?
Let’s see…
The first sentence made it clear it wasn’t a name, so if you read the article, you wouldn’t have made this claim.
See above.
AI writes iteratively, so this doesn’t mean anything. Also notice the “I think” in the beginning, that’s an opinion, not claiming facts like you do.
… so you are a fool for thinking that ai confused a name and title even after having the article explain it… why would you “think” it’s confusing it when you know they aren’t? That’s being a fool lmfao.
Your opinion isn’t valid and makes you a fool since the “facts” show that it didn’t happen. Not everything is Ai just because you don’t understand it… again…
Why are you arguing so badly that this is Ai and the only defense is either not reading the article or just ignoring the obvious…?
Sure, whatever, believe what you want. I am not going to waste any more time on this.