• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1814 days ago

      It’s funny because the people who usually say that are the kind of people who prioritize their feelings over facts.

      It’s all projection with conservatives

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        334 days ago

        This is the mirror that they made themselves and it gives them exactly what they think they can handle. But facts over feels will make for some great tweet meltdowns. 🍿

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      70
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I’d bet a lot on “Facts over feelings” being one of those hardcoded phrases that Grok was made to use whenever Grok is asked to present facts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        174 days ago

        Which is hilarious, because you know it was put in there to “own the libs,” but instead these chucklefucks get it thrown back in their faces.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      144 days ago

      It uses “Facts over feelings” as a diss against the very group of people who would normally use it

      • ByteOnBikesOP
        link
        fedilink
        124 days ago

        If you search for Grok in the tweet history, Grok has said it in almost every single message in the past three days. I can’t laugh any harder at this

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Problem? Seems as good a way as any to say conflicting feelings can go suck a dick when they need to reconcile with these facts over here. Dumb to get peeved over that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 days ago

        “Facts over feelings” has been used almost exclusively by conservative “influencers” for the last decade (despite them not really caring about facts, mind you). It’s a dog whistle at this point for being a massive dickwad.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 days ago

          Maybe unlearn that or learn to throw it back?

          Letting the other camp “own” signs like fake news, 👌🏼, or facts over feelings is basically cooperating with them & validating whatever they decide those signs mean for the rest of us. Yet the literal meaning of those words (& signs) can serve anyone. Language can be creative, no?

          Instead of ceding to them like a bunch of feeble losers (and implying we only argue with feelings), maybe we should reappropriate what was given, stir confusion, apply some creativity to make those signs serve us against the “dickwads” we oppose?

          That purity mentality of recoiling from anything “tainted” by those we oppose isn’t useful. It’s better to restore, redeem, create.