@[email protected] to [email protected] • 9 days agoBugs Found in sudowww.linux-magazine.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up140cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up140external-linkBugs Found in sudowww.linux-magazine.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 9 days agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink22•edit-29 days agoThe vulnerability in question would’ve still happened if written in rust, it was not a memory leak. More an instance of feature creep, as the solution was to remove the functionality.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•9 days agoWould something like ‘doas’ have the same issue?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•9 days agoI don’t believe so and it has been suggested as an alternative.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•9 days agoI would rather go with a completely new approach like the one of run0.
So ‘sudo-rs’ guys were right?
The vulnerability in question would’ve still happened if written in rust, it was not a memory leak.
More an instance of feature creep, as the solution was to remove the functionality.
Would something like ‘doas’ have the same issue?
I don’t believe so and it has been suggested as an alternative.
I would rather go with a completely new approach like the one of
run0.Rusty Bois are never right!