• HellsBelle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 days ago

      Drones can’t defend the Arctic. In fact they’d be fairly useless to most of Canada that doesn’t sit within the 49th-50th parallel.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 days ago

        You know you can launch satilites that cover the arctic right? Or you making some claim about the cold and the batteries.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            I mean, -60 is extremely unusual even in the high arctic, but the point stands at “just” -40.

            It’s usually more a matter of designers not bothering with severe cold conditions than any fundamental issue. In a pinch, I imagine just getting an FPV drone up to temperature in a tent or sleeping bag would give you a bit of range. For more, you’d need to insulate it and add a little internal heater, but that seems doable.

            Most of what happens in the arctic is going to involve long-distance gas (or nuclear) powered equipment anyway. It’s big and sparsely populated.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Sort of? Existing software isn’t smart enough to fight a battle on it’s own, and electronic warfare is a real thing that makes communications hard. In a full-blown war situation there’s appeal in having a human being in a cockpit close to possible targets.

      The things we worry about in Canada are more specific, though. For example, we probably don’t need long-range bombers of our own.