• @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      3114 days ago

      We don’t know about the longer term consequences yet, just like we didn’t about lead.

      Not saying it’s a definite but I wouldn’t be surprised.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4014 days ago

        No, people knew lead was poisonous even back near Roman days. Though just like how humans constantly do stupid things for some benefit, they kept using it as a sweetener for ages.

        Also mercury in relation to, “as mad as a hatter”. It’s just mercury was very good for the job.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          914 days ago

          To play devil’s advocate, we always knew lead was toxic, but we didn’t know the only healthy dose was 0

        • Default Username
          link
          fedilink
          English
          313 days ago

          Yes, but plastic is a very new invention and a lot less studied than something like Pb or Hg, which are natural elements.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            Natural in no way what so ever should imply more healthy. Especially in the context of lead and mercury.

            In a similar vein, asbestos is “all natural”, especially compared to fiber glass and foam, but it’s still unhealthy as fuck.

            • Default Username
              link
              fedilink
              English
              213 days ago

              Not sure where I said natural = better. All I said was natural things are generally more studied because they existed for lot longer.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                113 days ago

                It’s existed long enough that serious effects would’ve been obvious by now. Multiple generations have already passed. Multiple. It is already clearly not as serious as lead or mercury regardless of what effects are found.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1014 days ago

      I don’t think the impacts of microplastics are quite as catastrophic, they can’t be or we would already know.

      Which isn’t to say they aren’t bad just damn lead is realllly bad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2014 days ago

        The concentration of them is rising exponentially, that’s the part that terrifies me.

        It’s possible we just haven’t crossed a threshold yet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      My non-professional guess is that microplastics will eventually sterilize us by disrupting our sperm’s ability to function properly. Only the wealthy can afford the medical procedures to bypass this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        914 days ago

        Maybe kids will need to be carefully sheltered from plastics until they are old enough to freeze their sperm.

      • Kühlschrank
        link
        fedilink
        English
        714 days ago

        It’ll end up blocking vital neurotransmitters leaving us zombified and giving us an insatiable craving for brains

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        513 days ago

        'Twould be sweet irony and a blessing for the earth.

        Although the best method for removing it I’ve found is donating plasma (PFAs down 30% in 6 months of regular donation, the hope is nanoplastics are also removed…) so it might be the poors (in USA) and generous that get to have kids, so that’s nice…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1014 days ago

      We are just beginning to understand how much the chemical Imbalances that lead to depression, anxiety, and other mental health disorders originate in the digestive tract and how microplastics from food may disrupt the processing of these chemicals.