(and why conservatives hate public schools, ofc)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    It’s fine, just list it as “cellulose” on the ingredients list.

    (It’s not technically sawdust anymore after processing, but it’s still gross even though it’s food-safe.)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        718 days ago

        I mean, it’s not free, but yes, edible sawdust would be good for the health of most people in the western world. Though they tend to get cellulose from cheaper sources like straw or chaff.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          118 days ago

          Well they sure aren’t eating vegetables so might as well shove some sawdust replacement down their throats.