@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 12 days agoWhich git branch are you on?locklemmy.cafeimagemessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up1407
arrow-up1407imageWhich git branch are you on?locklemmy.cafe@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 12 days agomessage-square145fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink75•12 days agoMaster. I find this out of context fight against words pathetic.
minus-squareCubitOomlinkfedilinkEnglish48•edit-212 days agoMy scrum master said that we need new tickets to update the git branches and pipelines to use main instead of master since master was a bad word. I asked him what his job title was again and there was a pause. Then he said we can’t say that we are going to groom the code base anymore.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•12 days agoSwitch from your scrum main to your scrum alt.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•12 days agoIf we are not grooming the codebase, are we then waxing it? Or is it more eco-friendly to let the codebase grow wild and untrimmed?
minus-squaresnooggumslinkfedilinkEnglish8•12 days agoI’m gonna go ahead and assume your scrum main doesn’t groom themselves.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•12 days agoI know someone with a master’s degree from university. Well, he cut me a golden master copy of the track, anyway.
minus-squareEnkrodlinkfedilink9•12 days ago“I main in science degree of Evolutionary Biology” has a weird ring to it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•12 days agoI main Evolutionary Biology and have alts in Chemistry and Anatomy.
minus-squarePhoturislinkfedilink8•12 days agoI agree that it’s pathetic. I’ve never been a fan of virtue signaling. In the other hand, “main” is easier to type than “master” (or “trunk,” for that matter). So I’ve made peace with it.
minus-squaresnooggumslinkfedilinkEnglish5•12 days agoTrunk would be better because of all the branches.
minus-squareDerpgonlinkfedilink25•edit-212 days agoWhy not change “walkie talkie” to “radio phone”? It is so much cleaner. Because change for the sake of change always brings more work than what it saves. Why change something that works and everyone recognizes it? Of course, if this debate was there when the standard was created…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•12 days agoBecause it is a historically settled down terminology that everyone understands and there is no adequate reason to change it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•12 days ago everyone understands no, new people learn git every day. ‘main’ is much clearer. It’s maybe not the same readability gain as ‘blocklist/allowlist’ over ‘blacklist/whitelist’, but it’s still there.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•12 days agowe should make the empty string the name for the default branch
Master. I find this out of context fight against words pathetic.
My scrum master said that we need new tickets to update the git branches and pipelines to use main instead of master since master was a bad word.
I asked him what his job title was again and there was a pause.
Then he said we can’t say that we are going to groom the code base anymore.
Switch from your scrum main to your scrum alt.
If we are not grooming the codebase, are we then waxing it?
Or is it more eco-friendly to let the codebase grow wild and untrimmed?
I’m gonna go ahead and assume your scrum main doesn’t groom themselves.
I know someone with a master’s degree from university.
Well, he cut me a golden master copy of the track, anyway.
“I main in science degree of Evolutionary Biology” has a weird ring to it.
I main Evolutionary Biology and have alts in Chemistry and Anatomy.
I kinda unironically dig this.
Nice
I agree that it’s pathetic. I’ve never been a fan of virtue signaling.
In the other hand, “main” is easier to type than “master” (or “trunk,” for that matter). So I’ve made peace with it.
Trunk would be better because of all the branches.
Why master? main is much clearer
Why not change “walkie talkie” to “radio phone”? It is so much cleaner.
Because change for the sake of change always brings more work than what it saves.
Why change something that works and everyone recognizes it? Of course, if this debate was there when the standard was created…
Because it is a historically settled down terminology that everyone understands and there is no adequate reason to change it.
no, new people learn git every day.
‘main’ is much clearer. It’s maybe not the same readability gain as ‘blocklist/allowlist’ over ‘blacklist/whitelist’, but it’s still there.
Why main? m is much clearer
we should make the empty string the name for the default branch