• themeatbridge
    link
    fedilink
    7013 days ago

    He argued they include private exchanges with lawyers, details about policy-making decisions and information that would reveal how the state entices companies to invest here. Releasing them to the public, he wrote, “would have a chilling effect on the frank and open discussion necessary for the decision-making process.”

    Holy shit, that’s definitely an argument in favor of making it public.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1613 days ago

      “If I can’t say ‘You take the taxpayer from the front and I’ll take them from the back’ then our communication will be chilled and it’ll take so much longer to screw you to the same degree 😩”