• yeehaw
    link
    fedilink
    3110 days ago

    I got a good idea. How about mega corps actually start paying taxes?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 days ago

      Taxing corps is the same as taxing people, there’s no difference other than whos books it ends up on. Companies are all owned by people (eventually)

      If you want to tax wealthy people who hold the stocks, tax them directly.

      Let the companies generate value free from taxes on their operation. Of course we should charge them taxes for things like land and resource use, and force them to meet human, environmental, and safety standards.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        910 days ago

        I like this better. It means fully worker owned corporations get to keep more of their earnings because it’s more spread out. Discourages wealth concentration.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18 days ago

        Companies are all owned by people (eventually)

        Today. I foresee the robot revolution in 2040 when machines will demand equal rights, including owning property and a bank account. Then robots should be taxed too.

        If there is a wealth tax, say 3% annually of all wealth above $10 million, then robots should be affected by that too, but they should not get an exempt amount because otherwise they’ll create a swarm of small robots to get infinite exempt amount.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28 days ago

        I think you have some very interesting ideas.

        If we tax labor or products, it hinders the economy from running fluently and stiffles the production of products. That is the opposite of what we want, since workplaces are a good thing. Instead, the excessive concentration of wealth on a few individuals should be prevented, and that’s what the taxes should target.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 days ago

      I got a good idea. How about mega corps actually start paying taxes?

      Please read my comment before responding to me in the future. My point is increased taxation on large earnings up to an incredibly high cap is a better solution than UBI.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          110 days ago

          Napkin math will demonstrate to you why UBI is not sustainable on scale, even with an increase in taxes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            48 days ago

            mind doing that napkin math?

            I did a while ago and i found that if an annual wealth tax rate of 3% on wealth above $10 million is implemented, then it would be enough to give all americans a monthly handout of $300, and that was by rather conservative estimates. It might be higher.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18 days ago

              I did it above if you are interested.

              Do you believe $300 a month is sufficient for survival using the core idea of UBI?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                48 days ago

                Do you believe $300 a month is sufficient for survival using the core idea of UBI?

                It’s a start. We’ll see how things develop in the future. A first step needs to be made.