The rise in life expectancy has fuck all to do with capitalism given that life expectancy in both Cuba and China is higher than the US right now. Meanwhile, slavery continues to be the backbone of western economies.
I’m not claiming that capitalism improved life expectancy, but that in 99% of recorded history people died horribly very easily and at a very young age.
If you want to stay political, feudalism is a great example of glorious non-capitalistic system. You could starve to death because your crop had been taken by the lords or die hanged to a tree because you complained, but the system did not do considerable harm to the environment!
Not sure what point you’re even trying to make here. Life expectancy has been improving due to science and technology improving.
You could starve to death because your crop had been taken by the lords or die hanged to a tree because you complained
That’s literally how things work today where western corps exploit the workers in the global south. That’s what your lifestyle in the west is built on. Go read up on the coups, death squads, and other atrocities the west regularly commits around the world to keep the system of exploitation going. Here’s a good primer for you https://archive.org/details/KillingHope
Not sure what point you’re even trying to make here. Life expectancy has been improving due to science and technology improving.
In the XV/XVI century there was the equivalent of the Palestinian genocide, but scaled up to the entire surface of America, north+south. How can you tell that it was better then?
Last I checked, the genocide of the native population of America was fuelled by the British capitalism. Notably, capitalism was also the primary driver of African slave trade.
That simply isn’t true. You’ve made some pretty broad claims about the middle aged already and putting them together it’s a pretty easy guess you don’t know jack shit about that time period. Cause so far it seems like you’ve gotten all of your information from pop culture.
so we’re to the point where you’re not even making substantive arguable claims anymore, you’re just expecting people to agree with you because you use reasonable sounding framing
The Middle Ages were a long period with a lot of variety
omg just shut the fuck up you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about
It’s always so crazy how people can get ego trapped in the most pointless internet arguments. Like you aren’t saying anything! Just trying to wiggle your way through this when you could just walk away from the computer and do anything else.
Mao has a great quote about how if you don’t investigate something, you have no right to speak. Basically “shut up you stupid fucker” and statements like this are what it was for.
Mao has a great quote about how if you don’t investigate something, you have no right to speak. Basically “shut up you stupid fucker” and statements like this are what it was for.
That’s cool. Do you imply that starvation was uncommon in the medieval age?
What’s the problem with my example? Roman Empire qualifies for “recorded history”.
Do you prefer more recent times like 1800? Life expectancy comparable to the roman period, but the main causes of deaths were tuberculosis, pneumonia, cholera, and diarrhea. Yes, you can die of diarrhea.
What’s the problem with my example? Roman Empire qualifies for “recorded history”.
If you weren’t a shit lib jabroni intent on knee jerk defending a system that does literally nothing for you unless you own capital, so smug and self assured and addicted to the smell of your own farts, you’d realize the point of the “recorded history” statement isn’t “the systems used before were better”
the point of the statement is to illustrate how fleeting and ephemeral the supposed “only system that works” is. It has literally only existed for ~300 years, but stupid fuckers like you act like capitalist wage labor and property relations are just common sense “human nature”
Anyway, hope you’re thrown into a pit you dumb fucker
Which was under capitalism. Capitalism was the dominant mode of production in the 1800s. And directly responsible for the increase in diseases because it forced people to move to cities when Enclosure happened and people had to go work in factories.
I can see you already got told multiple times in these comments. But then again, I think, most can also see you don’t actually know anything you are talking about. So, uh.
My “fault” is that I didn’t notice that this was a bubble of people reinforcing each other’s far-left views and eager to insult anyone contradicting their black&white reality.
Although I enjoy having a political debate, and some were able to reply without behaving like rabid dogs, this is clearly a place for zealots, which is not who I am.
I see your centrist attitude is more advanced that other centrists’, so much so that it no longer enables fascism, unlike every other centrist! wow, you are so smart, i am totally in awe of you.
The right direction would obviously be socialism with public ownership of the means of production and an economy being directed towards meeting the needs of working majority as opposed to a handful of elites. Should be pretty obvious, yet here you are.
The greatest measurable increase in life expectancy and quality of life happened in China during the second half of the 20th century, during which it developed from backwater feudalism to centrally planned socialism.
The greatest measurable reduction in life expectancy and quality of life occured in former Soviet countries in the 1990s, where they devolved from centrally planned socialism to internationally financed capitalism.
No, you’re the only one here that doesn’t realize that OP is advocating for socialism. This is a meme attacking capitalist realism, not stating that feudalism was better. You’re in the fringe minority with that misinterpretation.
The west is authoritarian in that capitalists have full control, yes, and the PRC is making tremendous strides thanks to socialism.
Yeah, the classical mode of production was worse than what we have today. Slavery was worse than feudalism. Feudalism was worse than capitalism. Objectively speaking, for almost all of humanity, capitalism has brought about massive improvements in many aspects of life compared to previous modes of production[1].
The point isn’t that capitalism is uniquely bad. When it’s not crashing and burning, capitalism is very good at creating wealth. The problem is that liberals today often assume that because capitalism is better than the systems that came before it, it means it is the best possible system, and will never be replaced. We know, due to the contradictions at the foundation of capitalism, that it inevitably will destroy itself.
Mind you, this does depend on when you start counting for much of the colonized world; I’m not counting the period of primitive accumulation under colonialism as capitalism, despite the fact that capitalism couldn’t have come to, say, Latin America, without the Spanish and Portuguese colonial period having accumulated capital in the hands of the future bourgeoisie. A similar point also applies to Asia and Africa ↩︎
It’s sort of a niche history meme that the Inca could have made a kind of socialist state if they had more time. The idea goes back to a book from the 1930s
Sooner or later Capitalism will be replaced by a new -ism that will be the new best system possible, and that future generation will blame anyway with idiotic memes.
why are people pointing out the material reality of capitalism destroying the planet, don’t they know that is just the nature of things? Only idiots use memes to blame systems of oppression for the suffering of billions.
If each new mode of production is measurably better than the last (otherwise, why even bother making the negative comparison from capitalism to Rome as you did?), why are you acting like it’s meaningless for humanity to surpass capitalism? Do you really think it’s all the same or is it different?
Your nihilistic disregard for the improvements that could be offered by surpassing capitalism, and your detached attitude, seem to suggest that you don’t think very highly of the OOP for criticizing capitalism.
OP doesn’t say that an older system was better - especially not some super-specific one. Just that it’s NOT the only possible system and likely not the best there can be.
I’m arguing that if you lived in any of the previous systems, you would have dreamt to live in today’s Capitalism because it is the first system that produced a world where a large portion of humanity lived a safe and happy life.
It doesn’t mean that Capitalism is perfect. It’s just the best system so far.
Our current system is also going to consume itself and the entire planet in a couple generations. So sure, QOL for the select few who live in the Imperial core have increased massively. But it’s completely unsustainable.
Given that your account is 6 days old, and you’re just stirring up an argument by being deliberately obtuse and engaging in bad faith, I’m going to assume you’re a ban evasion account and you already know perfectly well that OP is a communist (and so are most of the people replying to you) but you’ve just decided to go about this conversation in the most annoying way possible.
Given that your account is 6 days old, and you’re just stirring up an argument by being deliberately obtuse and engaging in bad faith, I’m going to assume you’re a ban evasion account
You’d be wrong, but I’m not going to argue. In this whole thread I’ve read enough granitic opinion not open to debate.
The “not open to debate” part is what gets me. Dude, if you brought me something I hadn’t heard before, I’d have a much more charitable conversation. But as they’re talking right now it’s just an array of thought terminating cliches that I used to hear repeatedly on reddit and when talking with older family members.
deleted by creator
The rise in life expectancy has fuck all to do with capitalism given that life expectancy in both Cuba and China is higher than the US right now. Meanwhile, slavery continues to be the backbone of western economies.
I’m not claiming that capitalism improved life expectancy, but that in 99% of recorded history people died horribly very easily and at a very young age.
If you want to stay political, feudalism is a great example of glorious non-capitalistic system. You could starve to death because your crop had been taken by the lords or die hanged to a tree because you complained, but the system did not do considerable harm to the environment!
Not sure what point you’re even trying to make here. Life expectancy has been improving due to science and technology improving.
That’s literally how things work today where western corps exploit the workers in the global south. That’s what your lifestyle in the west is built on. Go read up on the coups, death squads, and other atrocities the west regularly commits around the world to keep the system of exploitation going. Here’s a good primer for you https://archive.org/details/KillingHope
In the XV/XVI century there was the equivalent of the Palestinian genocide, but scaled up to the entire surface of America, north+south. How can you tell that it was better then?
Last I checked, the genocide of the native population of America was fuelled by the British capitalism. Notably, capitalism was also the primary driver of African slave trade.
Of course there were the seeds because systems do not appear overnight, but that was not the Capitalism as we intend it today.
Wow, how convenient: “it wasn’t a perfect utopia so you’re not allowed to blame capitalism for it”.
A reasoning as perfectly smooth and circular as your brain
“It wasn’t real capitalism!”
Lol
Are you saying that since now only part of the world is starving, it was better in the medieval age when everyone was starving?
That simply isn’t true. You’ve made some pretty broad claims about the middle aged already and putting them together it’s a pretty easy guess you don’t know jack shit about that time period. Cause so far it seems like you’ve gotten all of your information from pop culture.
deleted by creator
so we’re to the point where you’re not even making substantive arguable claims anymore, you’re just expecting people to agree with you because you use reasonable sounding framing
deleted by creator
No
omg just shut the fuck up you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about
It’s always so crazy how people can get ego trapped in the most pointless internet arguments. Like you aren’t saying anything! Just trying to wiggle your way through this when you could just walk away from the computer and do anything else.
Lmao they reported you with a “So much for a respectful discussion”
Sure, if you say so.
Mao has a great quote about how if you don’t investigate something, you have no right to speak. Basically “shut up you stupid fucker” and statements like this are what it was for.
That’s cool. Do you imply that starvation was uncommon in the medieval age?
if “everyone was starving” how did humanity survive you dumb fucker
jason hickel talks a lot about actual medieval living standards if you’d ever like to be less of an ignorant dipshit
tell him to fix the Wikipedia then https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_of_1315–1317
I’m a huge fan of arguments of the form "Are you saying [absurd nonsense that in no way resembles what they say said]?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Motte-and-bailey_argument
Also, the nobility & clergy weren’t starving during feudalism, only the peasants during famines.
deleted by creator
I fail to see what any of this has to do with an economic system. These are scientific or legal topics.
And indeed, slavery is present under unchecked capitalism as well.
Don’t you see relationships between political and economic systems? Capitalism is probably the most evident example of that.
first-class example of whataboutism, favourite of useful idiots worlwide!
What’s the problem with my example? Roman Empire qualifies for “recorded history”.
Do you prefer more recent times like 1800? Life expectancy comparable to the roman period, but the main causes of deaths were tuberculosis, pneumonia, cholera, and diarrhea. Yes, you can die of diarrhea.
If you weren’t a shit lib jabroni intent on knee jerk defending a system that does literally nothing for you unless you own capital, so smug and self assured and addicted to the smell of your own farts, you’d realize the point of the “recorded history” statement isn’t “the systems used before were better”
the point of the statement is to illustrate how fleeting and ephemeral the supposed “only system that works” is. It has literally only existed for ~300 years, but stupid fuckers like you act like capitalist wage labor and property relations are just common sense “human nature”
Anyway, hope you’re thrown into a pit you dumb fucker
So you fail to understand how basic investment works, but you criticize Capitalism copy-pasting ideological statements.
Ok.
Which was under capitalism. Capitalism was the dominant mode of production in the 1800s. And directly responsible for the increase in diseases because it forced people to move to cities when Enclosure happened and people had to go work in factories.
i’m pretty sure the idea with anticapitalist sentiment isn’t to go backwards anymore, you know?
That’s not what OP implies when he says that capitalism only existed for 1% of recorded history.
You’re just fucking illiterate
I can see you already got told multiple times in these comments. But then again, I think, most can also see you don’t actually know anything you are talking about. So, uh.
None of the two.
My “fault” is that I didn’t notice that this was a bubble of people reinforcing each other’s far-left views and eager to insult anyone contradicting their black&white reality.
Although I enjoy having a political debate, and some were able to reply without behaving like rabid dogs, this is clearly a place for zealots, which is not who I am.
I see your centrist attitude is more advanced that other centrists’, so much so that it no longer enables fascism, unlike every other centrist! wow, you are so smart, i am totally in awe of you.
Nope, that’s exactly what I implied when I point out that capitalism is the wrong direction of human development.
I’m curious now: what would be the right direction without going backwards?
The right direction would obviously be socialism with public ownership of the means of production and an economy being directed towards meeting the needs of working majority as opposed to a handful of elites. Should be pretty obvious, yet here you are.
deleted by creator
The greatest measurable increase in life expectancy and quality of life happened in China during the second half of the 20th century, during which it developed from backwater feudalism to centrally planned socialism.
The greatest measurable reduction in life expectancy and quality of life occured in former Soviet countries in the 1990s, where they devolved from centrally planned socialism to internationally financed capitalism.
OP is advocating for socialism, not for a regression to feudalism.
deleted by creator
Are you deliberately being disingenuous or are you really that stupid?
No, you’re the only one here that doesn’t realize that OP is advocating for socialism. This is a meme attacking capitalist realism, not stating that feudalism was better. You’re in the fringe minority with that misinterpretation.
The west is authoritarian in that capitalists have full control, yes, and the PRC is making tremendous strides thanks to socialism.
Ok, bye.
How many times are you going to say “bye” before you actually fuck off?
Take the exit for chauvinists, don’t let the trapdoor hit you on the way down
Don’t suffocate in your bubble.
Mate, you’re the one running away because you can’t deal with people having different beliefs to you
pick one
Why would you say it isn’t? The west is made up of dictatorships of capital, workers have little to no power.
Yeah, the classical mode of production was worse than what we have today. Slavery was worse than feudalism. Feudalism was worse than capitalism. Objectively speaking, for almost all of humanity, capitalism has brought about massive improvements in many aspects of life compared to previous modes of production[1].
The point isn’t that capitalism is uniquely bad. When it’s not crashing and burning, capitalism is very good at creating wealth. The problem is that liberals today often assume that because capitalism is better than the systems that came before it, it means it is the best possible system, and will never be replaced. We know, due to the contradictions at the foundation of capitalism, that it inevitably will destroy itself.
Mind you, this does depend on when you start counting for much of the colonized world; I’m not counting the period of primitive accumulation under colonialism as capitalism, despite the fact that capitalism couldn’t have come to, say, Latin America, without the Spanish and Portuguese colonial period having accumulated capital in the hands of the future bourgeoisie. A similar point also applies to Asia and Africa ↩︎
Oh come on we all KNOW that the Inca would have created industrial socialism by like 1750 if it wasn’t for the damn Spanish
I mean, the Incan mita system was kind of a centralized public works socialism before the Spanish arrived. Maybe that’s what you were getting at
It’s sort of a niche history meme that the Inca could have made a kind of socialist state if they had more time. The idea goes back to a book from the 1930s
My Civ VI games have those foos landing on Mars in the 19th century.
Finally someone reasonable here!
Sooner or later Capitalism will be replaced by a new -ism that will be the new best system possible, and that future generation will blame anyway with idiotic memes.
It’s just in the nature of things.
i hope you’re thrown head first into a pit
Who are you, Schopenhauer?
If each new mode of production is measurably better than the last (otherwise, why even bother making the negative comparison from capitalism to Rome as you did?), why are you acting like it’s meaningless for humanity to surpass capitalism? Do you really think it’s all the same or is it different?
I never said that humanity shouldn’t surpass capitalism. Actually I think it will happen like it always happened with every system.
Your nihilistic disregard for the improvements that could be offered by surpassing capitalism, and your detached attitude, seem to suggest that you don’t think very highly of the OOP for criticizing capitalism.
Yes, I criticise OP for how he expressed the idea.
No, I believe that things change constantly and that includes political and economical systems.
What specifically is wrong with how the idea was expressed?
OP doesn’t say that an older system was better - especially not some super-specific one. Just that it’s NOT the only possible system and likely not the best there can be.
So I’m not sure who exactly you’re arguing with.
I’m arguing that if you lived in any of the previous systems, you would have dreamt to live in today’s Capitalism because it is the first system that produced a world where a large portion of humanity lived a safe and happy life.
It doesn’t mean that Capitalism is perfect. It’s just the best system so far.
Waiting for OP to tell us what should come next.
Our current system is also going to consume itself and the entire planet in a couple generations. So sure, QOL for the select few who live in the Imperial core have increased massively. But it’s completely unsustainable.
Probably a large portion of the world would agree on that. A change, especially for the environment, is inevitable.
Correlation != Causation
As others have pointed out we have better lives today because of scientific and technological progress not because of capitalism.
Progress that did not happen at the same rate in non-capitalistic societies.
You’re right, USSR managed to accomplish an equivalent of a century of progress under capitalism in the west in a couple of decades.
Socialism obviously
Given that your account is 6 days old, and you’re just stirring up an argument by being deliberately obtuse and engaging in bad faith, I’m going to assume you’re a ban evasion account and you already know perfectly well that OP is a communist (and so are most of the people replying to you) but you’ve just decided to go about this conversation in the most annoying way possible.
You’d be wrong, but I’m not going to argue. In this whole thread I’ve read enough granitic opinion not open to debate.
Bye!
The “not open to debate” part is what gets me. Dude, if you brought me something I hadn’t heard before, I’d have a much more charitable conversation. But as they’re talking right now it’s just an array of thought terminating cliches that I used to hear repeatedly on reddit and when talking with older family members.
Capitalism hasn’t done shit for you you brainwashed piece of shit
It made iPhone
Hey, that’s not fair, their boss probably pays them a wage that makes the reproduction of their labor possible.
And how do you know that? I’m curious.