• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    127 days ago

    How about we ban these by-elections that only exist to give a loser a second chance. Idgaf I’d it’s libs, cins, NDP, bloc, crab people, no one should get to run a second time just because they are party leader.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Not to mention this asshole getting a do-over is costing the Canadian taxpayer a bit of money. I expect a personal thank you note for the charity, Poilievre.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        87 days ago

        The only reason the seat is vacant is because they wanted to give PP another chance. Without that, they still have their MP.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            56 days ago

            Sure. Then you run the election and if anybody else in the area wants to run in the same party as the person who left then the party can put them on the ballot. If not, then no candidate for that party. Don’t drop somebody in from elsewhere. Pretty simple. Just pick a time period that a person needs to have lived in a riding (say, one full election cycle) before running to represent the area.

            If the person wins the election and moves (other than to government housing in Ottawa so they can do their job) then they give up their seat.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            26 days ago

            To add on to this, unless we enact political slavery, which while it might sound fun is not likely to make politicians who are subject to it vote in the best interests of the country, then politicians are going to be able to leave their positions at any time anyways, so a by-election is the only reasonable way to ensure the constituents of their riding are properly represented. And if you put some kind of significant delay before people can run in a by-election keep in mind this one is already going to be about 6 months since the last one, and that becomes less of an impediment the richer you are, meaning it gives an advantage to wealthy parachute politicians with no real benefit to citizens.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 days ago

        The person who wins gets it…

        Personally I don’t think we should even select a prime minister till after the election so people don’t just vote for the “leader” over the local candidate. PM is chosen by winning party from winning MPs

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          56 days ago

          All MPs vote on who the PM is after the election already, they just usually vote for their party leader