• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Before it happens they put it in EULA which they did.

    You acknowledge that if you fail to comply with the foregoing restrictions Nintendo may render the Nintendo Account Services and/or the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part.

    It couldn’t be any clearer.

    • missingno
      link
      fedilink
      422 days ago

      You’re fixating on legalese boilerplate, I’m talking about what they’re actually doing.

      Go back to the start of this conversation. OP said it should just be online bans, I said that it is, and you’re umackshuallying over what hasn’t actually happened.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 days ago

        The “legalese” explicitly stated in clear words that they have right to brick your device. If they had no intention of doing it they wouldn’t put that in.

        This was added so once they brick it they can argue in court that you agreed to this when purchased your switch.

        • missingno
          link
          fedilink
          222 days ago

          OP said it should just be online bans, I said that it is, and you’re umackshuallying over what hasn’t actually happened.

          If it ever happens, we can resume this conversation, but until then?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            322 days ago

            What do you expect? Disable console first, then put things in EULA?

            Why put something like this in EULA if there’s no intention of doing it, especially as they didn’t put it for EU where such practice is outright illegal?

            • missingno
              link
              fedilink
              222 days ago

              I’m talking about what has actually happened, you’re talking about what hasn’t happened.

              Please review the top comments that started this conversation.