• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    A drunk driver who kills a family on their way home might not have intended for it to happen, but that doesn’t remove the drunks culpability. But the difference in this case, that lady definitely did vote to hurt/kill children just didn’t expect it to be hers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 days ago

      did vote to hurt/kill children

      No. She voted for her and her loved once safety and well-being even at the expense of others. Most of the people are not sociopathic and picturing them as such only helps autocracy to rise.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The drunk didn’t drive home to kill, they left the party to get back home to their loved ones…Their actions still directly led to death of innocent people. It’s their fault for being too ignorant to understand the consequences of their actions.

        They voted to kill kids just like every single person supporting tax cuts for billionaires has the death of those who lose needed medical care.

        Or use the CEO from United…his actions and policy’s definitely helped shareholders but also caused tons of death. Did he vote to kill them …not directly but putting profits over care definitely killed lots of people that deserves the care they paid for.

        So this lady didn’t vote for her kids safety and if she says she did, she is either lying or stupid. Take your pick