Ah so you can’t handle any pushback to any of your points. It’s no wonder you’re famous around here.
You can’t make fun of my own comprehensive skill when you are the one that clearly didn’t read my last post and made yourself look like a total fool. I admitted I made a mistake but seems to me you’re doubling down.
Which one of us is showing minimal level of literacy? Certainly not the person that didn’t read their own Wiki post and fail to respond to any counterpoint.
You can’t make fun of my own comprehensive skill when you are the one that clearly didn’t read my last post and made yourself look like a total fool.
I read the post. I just found it so utterly detached from what was actually written in the wiki article, including some truly bizarre play about how the courts were the ones who TRULY gave LGBT folk rights while also dismissing pro-LGBT executive and legislative action as meaningless, because… it was struck down by the courts.
If that’s your peak level of literacy, there’s really no reason to play stupid games with you. I have no need of stupid prizes.
Which one of us is showing minimal level of literacy? Certainly not the person that didn’t read their own Wiki post and fail to respond to any counterpoint.
Yeah it’s definitely the person that always accuses the other one of the minimal lack of comprehension literacy that’s the strongest orator in the thread.
Definitely not the sign of a weak debater with a person that can’t support their own points.
Look I get that you don’t actually have a response which is why you just keep trying to dismiss my counterpoints of “well when people fight in the courts” it’s not the Democrats doing anything. And you still haven’t pointed to any legislation or executive actions besides hand waving at a Wikipedia article that didn’t support your point.
We all know that you can’t support your point it’s okay to just stop arguing.
I mean this would work except it’s not your house, you offered a public opinion in a community that encourages debate. It’s almost like this is an expected reaction to posting something on Lemmy.
But of course I’d expect the person that keeps accusing me of having poor literacy to have that understanding.
Do you guys not know what going to like your local volunteer organizations is?
Like do you think volunteering at your local org is just doing nothing?
And its going to be harder if legislation is passed to make that illegal. Hence why we should be showing up to vote to give us as much space as possible to do so and grow our progressive movements. Tankies ignore this because they are not serious about achieving goals.
I’m sure they’d say something like “Just vote third party!” or “Just overthrow the government!”, ignoring that harm reduction assists projects like serious third party attempts (rather than the perennial Hail Mary every four years and no serious work on the local level actually building a fucking party) and organizing the proletariat against oppression (which becomes immensely more difficult under increased pressure from capital or from the inside of a fucking concentration camp)
He’s whining and crying without proposing any actually viable solutions. He’s simply working in opposition to the best option we have, especially over the next few elections.
Asking for you to support your position and if you have a source for it is a fallacy?
Man you must be popular at The Debate Club.
Don’t answer any questions and just accuse people of being illiterate and using fallacies when you don’t want to answer a question. What a wonderful strategy you have displayed for us
Ah so you can’t handle any pushback to any of your points. It’s no wonder you’re famous around here.
You can’t make fun of my own comprehensive skill when you are the one that clearly didn’t read my last post and made yourself look like a total fool. I admitted I made a mistake but seems to me you’re doubling down.
Which one of us is showing minimal level of literacy? Certainly not the person that didn’t read their own Wiki post and fail to respond to any counterpoint.
I read the post. I just found it so utterly detached from what was actually written in the wiki article, including some truly bizarre play about how the courts were the ones who TRULY gave LGBT folk rights while also dismissing pro-LGBT executive and legislative action as meaningless, because… it was struck down by the courts.
If that’s your peak level of literacy, there’s really no reason to play stupid games with you. I have no need of stupid prizes.
Sorry that you really want me to play slop games with your complete inability to process information.
Yeah it’s definitely the person that always accuses the other one of the minimal lack of comprehension literacy that’s the strongest orator in the thread.
Definitely not the sign of a weak debater with a person that can’t support their own points.
Look I get that you don’t actually have a response which is why you just keep trying to dismiss my counterpoints of “well when people fight in the courts” it’s not the Democrats doing anything. And you still haven’t pointed to any legislation or executive actions besides hand waving at a Wikipedia article that didn’t support your point.
We all know that you can’t support your point it’s okay to just stop arguing.
I mean this would work except it’s not your house, you offered a public opinion in a community that encourages debate. It’s almost like this is an expected reaction to posting something on Lemmy.
But of course I’d expect the person that keeps accusing me of having poor literacy to have that understanding.
And you don’t understand what sealioning is. Also unsurprising.
@[email protected] also won’t propose an alternative course of action like a serious person would.
Do you guys not know what going to like your local volunteer organizations is?
Like do you think volunteering at your local org is just doing nothing?
Bunch of idealistic babies
And its going to be harder if legislation is passed to make that illegal. Hence why we should be showing up to vote to give us as much space as possible to do so and grow our progressive movements. Tankies ignore this because they are not serious about achieving goals.
I’m sure they’d say something like “Just vote third party!” or “Just overthrow the government!”, ignoring that harm reduction assists projects like serious third party attempts (rather than the perennial Hail Mary every four years and no serious work on the local level actually building a fucking party) and organizing the proletariat against oppression (which becomes immensely more difficult under increased pressure from capital or from the inside of a fucking concentration camp)
Bingo.
He’s whining and crying without proposing any actually viable solutions. He’s simply working in opposition to the best option we have, especially over the next few elections.
I am not even saying that my idea is the end all be all, but I am open to hearing amendments and actionable alternatives.
Asking for you to support your position and if you have a source for it is a fallacy?
Man you must be popular at The Debate Club.
Don’t answer any questions and just accuse people of being illiterate and using fallacies when you don’t want to answer a question. What a wonderful strategy you have displayed for us