@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • edit-23 days agoThey even got their own island🤦sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square207fedilinkarrow-up11.4K
arrow-up11.4KimageThey even got their own island🤦sh.itjust.works@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • edit-23 days agomessage-square207fedilink
minus-squareSeductiveTortoiselinkfedilinkEnglish72•3 days agoBe a little nicer to them, they got rejected for some old dude!
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilink33•3 days agoHah. I know likely comedic misunderstanding but, in case it was not clear, the 27-year-old pedo was the gross one.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•3 days agoDon’t worry, I got what you meant. I assume the other poster did as well, but had to make the joke haha.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•3 days agoThey deserved it. They should have known to wait 13 years to date a 14 year old. The equation is 1/2 your age +1.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•3 days ago… The formula is 1/2 your age + 7 tho. So for that 27 year old dating a teenager it would certainly not be okay. 27/2=13.5+7 which i would generously round down to 20 years of appropriate minimum age.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•3 days ago27/2+1=14,5 so don’t think i can agree with this ancient wisdom.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•3 days agoThey got the formula wrong. Half your age +7 is the correct one. Works surprisingly well.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•3 days agoit’s transcended “works well” to “has literally become the cultural standard,” IMO.
Be a little nicer to them, they got rejected for some old dude!
Hah. I know likely comedic misunderstanding but, in case it was not clear, the 27-year-old pedo was the gross one.
Don’t worry, I got what you meant. I assume the other poster did as well, but had to make the joke haha.
They deserved it. They should have known to wait 13 years to date a 14 year old. The equation is 1/2 your age +1.
… The formula is 1/2 your age + 7 tho.
So for that 27 year old dating a teenager it would certainly not be okay. 27/2=13.5+7 which i would generously round down to 20 years of appropriate minimum age.
I think they’re being sarcastic…
27/2+1=14,5 so don’t think i can agree with this ancient wisdom.
They got the formula wrong.
Half your age +7 is the correct one. Works surprisingly well.
it’s transcended “works well” to “has literally become the cultural standard,” IMO.