• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 day ago

    Not true, “pro-life” is actually “anti-woman’s life”. Those people would rather have an adult person die from an ectopic pregnancy than have a clump of cancer removed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 day ago

      This. Pro-life supporters don’t care if the mother dies. Hell, corpses get more rights than pregnant women, because at least people can refuse to be organ donors

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        So you nazis have mind reading technologies now?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Resorting to calling me a Nazi now? Thanks for telling me that you have no actual counterargument.

          The Pro-Choice argument is one of bodily autonomy. If people have the right to refuse the use of their organs to save others after they are dead, then everyone should also have the right to refuse the same while they are alive.

          Not only that, bans on abortion adds red tape to many procedures necessary to keep the mother alive, incpuding in situations where the fetus isn’t viable. If the fetus dies in the womb and the mother doesn’t naturally expel it, she needs an abortion ot it’ll rot and kill here. If the zygote never fully makes it to the uterus and starts developing inside the ovarian tubes, it needs to be aborted or it will kill both the mother and the fetus.

          Making it harder for pregnant women to gain access to these procedures is needlessly and ridiculously cruel.

          And let’s also discuss your Nazi claims: I’m pro-workers right, pro-consumer rights, pro-privacy. I think we need to increase social welfare services to help the most vulnerable of us, including some form of universal healthcare. But I’m a Nazi simply because I support the 2nd ammendment? Yeah, that bullshit. You aren’t worth wasting more of my time on.

          • Flax
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 day ago

            The Pro-Choice argument is one of bodily autonomy. If people have the right to refuse the use of their organs to save others after they are dead, then everyone should also have the right to refuse the same while they are alive.

            The choice is made when she gets pregnant. A slim minority of abortions are in cases of rape. Because I know pro-aborts like to bring up rare scenarios every time

            Not only that, bans on abortion adds red tape to many procedures necessary to keep the mother alive, incpuding in situations where the fetus isn’t viable. If the fetus dies in the womb and the mother doesn’t naturally expel it, she needs an abortion ot it’ll rot and kill here. If the zygote never fully makes it to the uterus and starts developing inside the ovarian tubes, it needs to be aborted or it will kill both the mother and the fetus.

            Removing a dead foetus isn’t murder. Of course I’m not advocating for a ban on that

            You’re a nazi because you’re using dogwhistles by referring to humans as “lumps of cancer”. That’s a classic dehumanisation tactic.

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 day ago

      A foetus isn’t a clump of cancer. No need to use a Eugenicist dog-whistle, Nazi.