• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I think it would be different if the provocateurs in question weren’t, like, religious zealots or whatever. I have little confidence their aim is to move the needle in a direction I’d like it to go.

    I’ve argued with plenty of do-nothing dip shits about Just Stop Oil who are concerned solely with getting to work on time and, apparently, the plexiglass in front of famous paintings. But the difference is, Just Stop Oil is a cause I can get behind. I’m not worried that supporting them would also lead to mandatory chastity cages, you know?

    I mean, I will admit the first steam list I saw, I thought “This seems bad. Can’t imagine missing any of these titles, though.”

    [edit] I actually forgot to mention this: The “right way” to do, like, CSAM counter-terrorism on the level of whatever is happening now will virtually always incense a bunch of libertarians—it’s not really avoidable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That’s just about how I feel.

      Although I do wish we could take action on obviously terrible media without fearing slippery slopes to mandatory chastity cages.

      I have to assume there are many non-zealot feminists who exist and are happy to see this gone. But all I see online is grumbling- it’s disturbing

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 day ago

        To be clear, I’m talking about leadership. It’d be a bit like celebrating J.K. Rowling for her advocacy against spousal abuse, meanwhile, she’s still dumping hundreds of thousands of dollars into nazi anti-trans groups. More of a broken clock situation than a slippery slope.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 day ago

          Never thought I would be finding common ground on a controversial topic with a guy named petrol_sniff_king but here we are