Why does one replace the other? Ever since 9/11 I’ve noticed a real push to discredit conspiracy theories to the point where the term now invokes images of lunatics with tin foil hats and insane ideas like lizard people and whatnot. It’s been really effective too. Like, there’s things out there that sound bat shit crazy until it turns out they were true - like operation Northwoods for example - but nobody seems to care because they are verified decades later.

Sure, there’s visible people out there that can be blamed, but why is it so outlandish that there may be more who know how to hide from public scrutiny?

I’ve always wondered for example, what ever happened to the vast wealth of all these families that feature in every conspiracy theory like the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers etc? Are we to believe that they just faded away from public affairs, are no longer important and that the richest men in the world are the newbies, Bezos Elon etc? I’ve not looked into it or anything (Eddie Bravo style) but somehow I don’t buy it, I bet they’re still behind major things that are happening today. If anyone has an explanation I’d love to hear it btw. Would love nothing better than a good debunking.