• qyron
    link
    fedilink
    English
    619 hours ago

    Meanwhile, I often work with immediate risk of death or injury and, by law, I can not be equipped with a panic button for rescue purposes, as it is deemed unlawful surveillance of the worker.

    I am supposed to warn in advance what work I will be doing and agree on a reasonable time window for it to be done safely, before having to call in again to say I am not yet dead and if the task is done or not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 hours ago

      by law, I can not be equipped with a panic button for rescue purposes, as it is deemed unlawful surveillance of the worker

      That makes no sense. What country and what law? For one example, GDPR has an exemption for cases like that. And for another, how can it be surveillance when the communication is initiated by the worker as part of their job?

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 hours ago

      I think I would make an exception to that law for a panic button or other emergency device that only transmits when activated, like a ship’s EPIRB or an aircraft’s ELT.

      • qyron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 hours ago

        It’s strange. Apparently it is one of those situations where the possibilty of something very useful being easily abused by companies to spy on their people is too great.