The Trump administration recently published “America’s AI Action Plan”. One of the first policy actions from the document is to eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change from the NIST’s AI Risk Framework.

Lacking any sense of irony, the very next point states LLM developers should ensure their systems are “objective and free from top-down ideological bias”.

Par for the course for Trump and his cronies, but the world should know what kind of AI the US wants to build.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    292 days ago

    The phrasing means everything.

    Example: “Trump wants…”

    VS

    Example: “America wants…”

    Big difference. Executive Orders are a memo, not law. It’s disturbing that I have to keep saying this and explaining this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      You know, this might actually be really bad politics.

      Trump is not the only person at the top. He’s kind of a lame duck, actually: he just does whatever Miller says. The only time he steps in is when he’s personally insulted by something because he desperately wants everyone to know he’s a very special boy.

      I do take issue with democrats blaming everything the republicans are up to on Trump specifically, as if the party might return to normal once he dies.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 days ago

        It probably will return somewhat to normal, assuming public opinion continues on its trajectory. People overwhelmingly don’t like Trump, so anyone affiliated w/ him are going to hurt in the next couple elections unless public opinion turns around.

        I don’t know what “normal” looks like, but it’s probably somewhere between Trump and Bush. I’m still not a fan, but moving away from Trump is going to be a net win.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 days ago

          anyone affiliated w/ him

          Well, this is what I’m asking for, so I sure hope so.

          but it’s probably somewhere between Trump and Bush.

          So, keep in mind, republican voters are not upset with Trump because they’ve decided they no longer want a border wall. The architects of Project 2025 don’t need anything from Trump but political power, which they already have.

          The next election cycle, if it’s real, I do imagine will swing back, but it cannot just “swing back,” it needs to deal with the sickness plaguing the US. That sickness is the republican party. That sickness is the republican voter.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 days ago

            That sickness is the republican party. That sickness is the republican voter.

            I disagree, and this just smacks of tribalism.

            The problem is people wanting to force others into their worldview, parties are just a tool to get that done. The real solution is ending the two party system so people can express themselves better, not to replace one problem with another.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              115 hours ago

              The problem is people wanting to force others into their worldview,

              No, I will force nazis into my worldview, actually. They can come willingly, or we can beat them into submission like we did 80 years ago.

              What, actually, is wrong with you? Building alligator auschwitz does, in fact, make you a bad person—if you seriously disagree with this, then you and I are enemies.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                115 hours ago

                Yes, building the detention center is absolutely terrible. I hate everything about the recent changes WRT immigration, and I probably don’t even know the half of it.

                We’re a nation of immigrants, and we should absolutely be encouraging more legal immigration. In fact, my personal opinion is that we should make a new type of temporary “work seeking” visa where you’re given some time (say, 1 month) to find a job, and if you get a job, it automatically turns into a work authorization visa, with the stipulation that the employer must report when that job ends, at which point you have another month to find a new job before you have to leave. IMO, this completely solves the migrant worker issue, without needing to mess w/ quotes for longer-term visas. Those employers would also receive closer scrutiny to catch any illegal activity (i.e. shell companies employing cartels).

                However, associating it w/ the Holocaust is disgusting and again smacks of tribalism. Yes it’s a terrible facility, but AFAIK there’s zero overlap w/ what the Nazis did. Since it’s on US soil, they do have to follow US law in how they treat people, unlike Gitmo.

                nazis… we can beat them into submission

                If you actually think Republicans have much overlap w/ Nazis, then you’re delusional. It’s just like Republicans claiming Democrats are Marxists. The name calling isn’t productive and just cheapens what each of those terms mean.

                Yes, some people in the Republican camp court fascist policies, but by and large, they are not fascist. Call them out on actual policy issues and convince people to vote them out w/ logic, don’t just lean into rhetoric.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  14 hours ago

                  You think that caging brown people “for no reason” is a disgusting comparison to the Holocaust?

                  This is unreal. I didn’t see this conversation coming at all. You’re actually doing nazi apologia. You’re refusing to acknowledge the pressure building in your pipes only because the pipes haven’t burst yet. How many brown people do you want to die before you’re willing to concede this? Do we need to wait until the full 6 million?

                  they do have to follow US law in how they treat people

                  No. They don’t.

                  • Neither Democrat congress members nor journalists are allowed to see what’s happening inside that camp. Rather, they are, legally, but they’re being prevented from doing so anyway.
                  • The Democrats are weak and refuse to punish Republicans for anything. If there is no threat of punishment, they can just do whatever they want. Republicans have abused this weakness of Democrats like 5 billion times.
                  • The Big Beautiful Bill includes a provision that judicial funds cannot be used to pursue rulings. This passed, so, if it can’t be repealed, this means it is illegal to use funds intended to punish criminals to seek punishment for Republicans breaking the law. This kills the law.

                  Call them out on actual policy issues

                  Call them out for being evil. Their policies are evil.

                  If the majority of Republicans are not evil, as you say, then they should have no problem dropping the line. They can form a new party, and the current one can be dropped into a wastebin in hell.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 days ago

        I’m arguing that you’re intentionally trying to play semantics with phrasing and claim it doesn’t matter, when it absolutely does, and everyone in here is explaining to you why. That’s all.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 days ago

            And since you did use the word “policy”, I did mention that EO’s aren’t laws. It’s a memo. He has no control via EOnof anyone except the people in his purview. Not private companies, not researches, not law, not state governments.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                52 days ago

                EO’s are policy insofar as they can affect the Executive Branch and what it controls, and nothing else. The history of the use is mainly for “the spirit” of something, but only in the past 20 years or so has been weaponized to be used for trying to attempt to guide actual policy. Never in the way Trump has tried to use them, which is “law by decree”.

                The joke is they know it’s bullshit and meaningless. This all happened in his first term. 220 total, 157 shot down in court, 27 revoked. It’s an office memo at best. Biden even tried to do thenstudent debt cancellation through EO, and it got shot down in court.

      • Tony Bark
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 days ago

        Executive orders only affect federal agencies. If they were laws, we’d all be arrested.