Once again the survival of the species is not on the line because of that.
That’s just an excuse you are making to justify a hate that has other roots.
Prove is in the complete disregard of proposed solutions: remote work, decentralized offices, traffic reduction instead of complete suppression, population reduction… And apparently disregard for other forms of pollution that could be reduced or eliminated instead, for instance, international traveling, or traveling at all, maybe people living in cities should never visit nature or different places, that travel will destroy the world!
Last reply, after blocking your because your insult.
Population control do not require any violent measure.
It can be as simple as making people lives better, as it has been proven that populations with higher life quality have less children. Then achieving the objective of having a lesser global population .
If we completely stop having children right now, worldwide, the population will not meaningfully decrease for the next 50 years.
The major amount of climate damage will be done within the next 20 years.
The only option to use population control to reduce climate damage would be to kill roughly half of the world’s population within the next 2-3 years.
So if that’s your solution, you are either advocating for the greatest genocide the world has ever seen or are argueing in bad faith because you know that your solution is nonsense.
Once again the survival of the species is not on the line because of that.
That’s just an excuse you are making to justify a hate that has other roots.
Prove is in the complete disregard of proposed solutions: remote work, decentralized offices, traffic reduction instead of complete suppression, population reduction… And apparently disregard for other forms of pollution that could be reduced or eliminated instead, for instance, international traveling, or traveling at all, maybe people living in cities should never visit nature or different places, that travel will destroy the world!
Yep, sure, genocide is of a problem the less drastic option.
You are a clown.
Last reply, after blocking your because your insult.
Population control do not require any violent measure.
It can be as simple as making people lives better, as it has been proven that populations with higher life quality have less children. Then achieving the objective of having a lesser global population .
Discussion ends here as you have been blocked.
If we completely stop having children right now, worldwide, the population will not meaningfully decrease for the next 50 years.
The major amount of climate damage will be done within the next 20 years.
The only option to use population control to reduce climate damage would be to kill roughly half of the world’s population within the next 2-3 years.
So if that’s your solution, you are either advocating for the greatest genocide the world has ever seen or are argueing in bad faith because you know that your solution is nonsense.