• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s ridiculous! They should hook it up to an exercise cycle and generate electricity off of it instead.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Depending on the length of the workout a more realistic number would be 30 to 90 W, 100 if you really push yourself for a short bout.

        Still, anything is better than nothing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          yeah, 20 squats are like, what? 2 minutes max? that’s 3 Wh at 100 W power, or 0.003 kWh.

          if you get $0.10 per kWh, that’s $0.0003 per passenger, that’s not enough to pay for a bus ticket.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 day ago
            1. Why are we talking about squats?

            2. Why is 2min somehow equivalent to 3?

            3. We’re comparing no power generated to any power generated, ignoring the equipment cost thats infinite gain.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              124 hours ago

              We’re comparing no power generated to any power generated, ignoring the equipment cost thats infinite gain.

              You have to subtract the cost for the power generation station from that, then it’s negative profit margin.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                You’re already building an exercise station whether it generates or not, you have to compare the two. Bike station doesn’t need cameras and sensors, probably much cheaper computer too. Heck, the power savings from dropping the detection equipment and algorithm are probably more than the power generated.