Bluesky had some controversy when it first came out. Now that it’s been around for a while, I’m curious what the consensus is. How does it compare to Mastodon? Is Bluesky now self-hostable and compatible with the Fediverse?

  • The 8232 ProjectOP
    link
    fedilink
    3010 days ago

    closed source

    Bluesky is open source.

    I don’t know why it’s being discussed here

    It is being discussed to see if things have changed.

    • James R Kirk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      My bad, I’m not an expert here but it’s weird that it’s open source and yet nobody else can have a bluesky? Like could I download that code and make a bluesky for everyone? If so why has nobody else done it? why is there only one for profit bluesky?

      To answer your question though, no nothing has changed.

        • James R Kirk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 days ago

          But if it’s open source what is stopping them from simply creating another bluesky like yesterday?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            29 days ago

            From what I can tell, Bluesky is much more demanding in terms of the technical challenge of doing this on your own, and part of the issue is that some of the key tools to make this easier don’t really exist yet, making it much harder than setting up a Mastodon instance for example, so part of what they want to do is bridge that gap as well as stand up more independent servers.

            • James R Kirk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 days ago

              So to make a bluesky with (for example) two users is available for anyone to create at any time, but is so extremely technically intensive that absolutely nobody besides the one company is capable of doing it? You don’t find that the slightest bit odd? I think the open source and decentralized claimes are straight up lies.