…The proposed Texas map is designed to net the GOP up to five House seats — potentially enough to decide the majority…

Outside Texas, key Democratic governors have launched an aggressive counteroffensive to try to neutralize the GOP’s redistricting push.

…Newsom, who’s made no secret of his presidential ambitions, has openly accused Trump of “rigging” the midterms and suggested California could redraw its map to eliminate all nine GOP-held seats.

[New York Gov. Kathy Hochul] called Monday for disbanding New York’s independent redistricting commission and embracing partisan hardball, telling reporters that she’s “tired of fighting this fight with my hand tied behind my back…I cannot ignore that the playing field has changed dramatically, and shame on us if we ignore that fact and cling tight to the vestiges of the past,” Hochul said.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    47 days ago

    How does changing New York’s redistricting rules help defeat Texas Republicans? Or prevent Florida Republicans or Ohio Republicans or Iowa Republicans or etc. from doing their own bullshit redistricting?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      257 days ago

      How does changing New York’s redistricting rules help defeat Texas Republicans?

      Texas is redistricting to give themselves as many red seats as possible…

      Like, it should be common sense, but no other state can stop Texas from doing that.

      So if Texas does that, the only response is blue states doing it to cancel it out…

      Do you understand that now?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It doesn’t, but the idea is that overtly partisan districting in blue states can compensate the overtly partisan districts in red states and keep the house as a whole in balance.

      The obvious problem is that this solution disenfranchises not just the minority voters in red and blue states, but also the majority voters. Non competitive elections are the death of democracy, and benefit only donors, machine politicians and corruption.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        47 days ago

        Things needs to get bad everywhere before people ask for something better. The US is in the middle of a right wing coup.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        37 days ago

        You are at war.

        But, to continue the metaphor, this is like blowing up your own bridges so they can’t be used by the advancing enemy. Sometimes it’s necessary, but it’s not something you should celebrate. You are sacrificing important strategic instruments of prosperity for temporary tactical advantage.

        • Devolution
          link
          fedilink
          167 days ago

          We tried that approach with the filibuster. And look and where that got us. The USA as we know it is over.

          We are in a new era. A much darker, more ruthless era.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      157 days ago

      Land doesn’t vote. People do. Redistrict all of the rural areas in any state to include even a single large city in that state and the whole country will be blue. Fascists have been doing it the opposite way for years.

      If enough blue states do it, it will directly counter the fascist push to do the same because without cheating, they just don’t have the numbers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yes, anti-fascists have to play the same game as fascists. None of this “when they go low…” shit can stand anymore.

        But I have a little bone to pick with your first statement: at the state level, that holds up (depending on the state), but at the federal level, land (ok, less populous states) has an outsized influence because of the permanent apportionment law from almost 100 years ago.

        Every California house member serves about 760k people, where Wyoming has 576k people total.

        That means 9.5M ((760k - 576k) x 52 seats) people in CA (or 16.4 Wyomings) effectively don’t get a say every time the house votes.

        And it’s even worse when we get to the electoral college (sum of House and Senate members per state). Wyoming has 192k people per electoral vote and CA has 732k people per electoral vote.

        So it’s not entirely fair to dismiss the people vs land vote.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 days ago

      What makes you think they won’t, or haven’t already?

      Gerrymandering is an old technique, and (tragically) ingrained in US politics. The difference now is how boldly and specifically the lines can be drawn to gain an unfair advantage.

      Whether or not California does it, you can count on Ohio and Florida doing their worst.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 days ago

        Exactly. Ohio and Florida are the way they are because they got so gerrymandered that they suffered brain drain and rapidly shifted red