Pro to [email protected]English • 7 days agoWikipedia editors adopt a policy giving admins the authority to quickly delete AI-generated articles that meet certain criteria, like incorrect citationslocken.wikipedia.orgmessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1816cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1816external-linkWikipedia editors adopt a policy giving admins the authority to quickly delete AI-generated articles that meet certain criteria, like incorrect citationslocken.wikipedia.orgPro to [email protected]English • 7 days agomessage-square116fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•6 days agoDid you copy and paste the wrong quote? That doesn’t say anything about organ harvesting. Also https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 days ago Did you copy and paste the wrong quote? That doesn’t say anything about organ harvesting. You’re really just going to play dumb on purpose? Why? What does that accomplish? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories Calls it a conspiricy theory, not “accusations and the counterarguments to said accusations” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories These both literally state that the claims are false in their openings You have literally just shown my point because you couldn’t be bothered to read past the headline.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-25 days agoIt really is like a pavlovian response for .worlders to just bark “.ml!, .ml!” Whenever they see it, like trained seals.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•5 days agoIf it was a pavlovian response, it would have been in my first reply. I’d ask for a Wikipedia article about Pavlov but I worry you’d send an unrelated link
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•5 days agoYou actually going to get back on topic at some point?
Did you copy and paste the wrong quote? That doesn’t say anything about organ harvesting.
Also
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories
You’re really just going to play dumb on purpose? Why? What does that accomplish?
Calls it a conspiricy theory, not “accusations and the counterarguments to said accusations”
These both literally state that the claims are false in their openings
You have literally just shown my point because you couldn’t be bothered to read past the headline.
.ml
It really is like a pavlovian response for .worlders to just bark “.ml!, .ml!” Whenever they see it, like trained seals.
If it was a pavlovian response, it would have been in my first reply.
I’d ask for a Wikipedia article about Pavlov but I worry you’d send an unrelated link
You actually going to get back on topic at some point?