• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    783 days ago

    But… but… the secureboot requirement and the anticheat were supposed to make the game free of cheaters!!i

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 days ago

      Yeah it’s not supported for my system so I can’t even launch it. But I was watching some friends stream it and it crashed for three out of four of them within two games. I don’t think any of us will be getting it after release.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 days ago

      It can help prevent various methods commonly used, but nothing can stop cheating. All you can do is minimise it.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        218 hours ago

        There’s lots they could do to minimise cheaters that they’re not doing. The main one being not sending the cheaters information in the first place.

        The wall hack cheat works because for some bizarre reason the server sends players information about the position of other players they can’t possibly see, players on the other side of the map for example, there’s no reason for the client to have that information. The cheaters cannot access information that isn’t given to them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 hours ago

          I agree that only sending absolute needed data is a great policy for stopping all sorts of cheating. I could see them skipping this step if they don’t have a way of doing it fast enough that won’t cause other issues like player pop in. That’s what it’s have to assume.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        233 days ago

        Counterpoint: you could not have TPM and secure boot requirements that needlessly alienates a large player base of Linux users.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Counter-counterpoint: Linux users are no users if a game is brimming with cheaters. Who the fuck plays a competitive multiplayer game full of cheaters only because it runs on Linux?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 days ago

            Every game has cheaters. If we could run our own servers, we could decide who we play with.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 days ago

                If we had private dedicated servers and the ability to play without anti-cheat, Linux support would be a non-issue. But because we don’t have that, anti-cheat is seen as a necessity, and we don’t have Linux support.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 days ago

          That’s true. My machine doesn’t have a TPM. I understand they are trying to make things easier for their team, but I agree I’d rather have wider support.

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Let people run their own servers, allow blacklists and whitelists. Enable instant replay and let mods van cheaters.

        Problem fucking solved.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 days ago

          That’s not going to solve cheating either, but I do prefer dedicated servers in general.

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            218 hours ago

            It will result in cheaters getting instantly identified and banned so then it’ll be less fun for them, and they’re less likely to do it.