StrikerM to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 years agoThe barbieheimer debate rageslemmy.worldimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.2K
arrow-up11.2KimageThe barbieheimer debate rageslemmy.worldStrikerM to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink21•2 years agoWhere is the incelness in this? Seems like a self roast about not getting girls
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•2 years agoIt’s the combination of self roast about not getting girls and sexism.
minus-squareFushuan [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoThe sexist remark about Barbie is the set up for the self deprecating joke. It’s not said seriously, it’s there to make you feel a little bit offended and engaged to then realise that they are making fun of themselves.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•2 years agoPeople in here lack humor to such a degree that they can’t even recognise a joke.
Where is the incelness in this?
Seems like a self roast about not getting girls
It’s the combination of self roast about not getting girls and sexism.
The sexist remark about Barbie is the set up for the self deprecating joke. It’s not said seriously, it’s there to make you feel a little bit offended and engaged to then realise that they are making fun of themselves.
People in here lack humor to such a degree that they can’t even recognise a joke.